Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZhang, Guanghui
dc.contributor.authorLi, Xueyan
dc.contributor.authorLu, Yingzhi
dc.contributor.authorTiihonen, Timo
dc.contributor.authorChang, Zheng
dc.contributor.authorCong, Fengyu
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-22T08:51:27Z
dc.date.available2022-12-22T08:51:27Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationZhang, G., Li, X., Lu, Y., Tiihonen, T., Chang, Z., & Cong, F. (2023). Single-trial-based temporal principal component analysis on extracting event-related potentials of interest for an individual subject. <i>Journal of neuroscience methods</i>, <i>385</i>, Article 109768. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109768" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109768</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_164499973
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/84554
dc.description.abstractBackground: Temporal principal component analysis (tPCA) has been widely used to extract event-related potentials (ERPs) at group level of multiple subjects ERP data and it assumes that the underlying factor loading is fixed across participants. However, such assumption may fail to work if latency and phase for one ERP vary considerably across participants. Furthermore, effect of number of trials on tPCA decomposition has not been systematically examined as well, especially for within-subject PCA. New method: We reanalyzed a real ERP data of an emotional experiment using tPCA to extract N2 and P2 from single-trial EEG of an individual. We also explored influence of the number of trials (consecutively increased from 10 to 42 trials) on PCA decomposition by comparing temporal correlation, the statistical result, Cronbach’s alpha, spatial correlation of both N2 and P2 for the proposed method with the conventional time-domain analysis, trial-averaged group PCA, and single-trial-based group PCA. Results: The results of the proposed method can enhance spatial and temporal consistency. We could obtain stable N2 with few trials (about 20) for the proposed method, but, for P2, approximately 30 trials were needed for all methods. Comparison with Existing Method(s): About 30 trials for N2 were required and the reconstructed P2 and N2 were poor correlated across participants for the other three methods. Conclusion: The proposed approach may efficiently capture variability of one ERP from an individual that cannot be extracted by group PCA analysis.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of neuroscience methods
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherevent-related potentials
dc.subject.otherprincipal component analysis
dc.subject.othersingle-trial analysis
dc.subject.otherback-projection
dc.subject.otherindividual subject
dc.titleSingle-trial-based temporal principal component analysis on extracting event-related potentials of interest for an individual subject
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202212225799
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineTekniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineLaskennallinen tiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineTietotekniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineSecure Communications Engineering and Signal Processingfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEngineeringen
dc.contributor.oppiaineComputational Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineMathematical Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSecure Communications Engineering and Signal Processingen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0165-0270
dc.relation.volume385
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 University of Jyvaskyla. Published by Elsevier B.V.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109768
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91748105), National Foundation in China (No. JCKY2019110B009 & 2020-JCJQ-JJ-252) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in Dalian University of Technology in China [DUT20LAB303 & DUT20LAB308], and the scholarships from China Scholarship Council (No. 201806060165). This study is to memorize Prof. Tapani Ristaniemi for his great help to Guanghui Zhang, Fengyu Cong and the other authors. Open access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0