Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorD’hondt, Sigurd
dc.contributor.authorPérez-León-Acevedo, Juan Pablo
dc.contributor.authorBarrett, Elena
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-30T07:51:51Z
dc.date.available2022-11-30T07:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationD’hondt, S., Pérez-León-Acevedo, J. P., & Barrett, E. (2022). The Indeterminacy of Precedent : Negotiating the Admissibility of Victim Participant Testimony before the International Criminal Court. <i>International Criminal Law Review</i>, <i>22</i>(5-6), 1068-1093. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10082" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-bja10082</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_101532375
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/84152
dc.description.abstractThe icc represents a legal laboratory that is still consolidating itself, with multiple unclarities in evidence and procedural law requiring resolution through jurisprudence. Our paper draws on interaction analysis to unpack this process, focusing on the jurisprudential construction of ‘dual status’ victim participant testimony. To elucidate how this evidentiary/procedural element is locally negotiated, we examine an excerpt from the Ongwen hearing transcripts, in which the defense objects against the testimony by a dual status witness called by the victim participants’ legal representative. The analysis traces how the defense counsel’s objection is anchored in a trajectory of prior decisions, and demonstrates that the implementation of the criteria drawn from these decisions is mediated by deep-rooted common-sense assumptions about the ‘ownership’ of testimony. These unspoken assumptions open up a discursive space in which trial actors can discuss the interactional quality of testimony, which adds an element of contingency to the final decision.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherBrill
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Criminal Law Review
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.otherInternational Criminal Court
dc.subject.otherdual status victim participants
dc.subject.othertestimony
dc.subject.otherobjections
dc.subject.otherintertextuality
dc.subject.othertext trajectories
dc.subject.otherprecedent
dc.titleThe Indeterminacy of Precedent : Negotiating the Admissibility of Victim Participant Testimony before the International Criminal Court
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202211305424
dc.contributor.laitosKieli- ja viestintätieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Language and Communication Studiesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1068-1093
dc.relation.issn1567-536X
dc.relation.numberinseries5-6
dc.relation.volume22
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Brill, 2022
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysouhrit
dc.subject.ysodiskurssintutkimus
dc.subject.ysointertekstuaalisuus
dc.subject.ysokansainvälinen oikeus
dc.subject.ysooikeudenkäynti
dc.subject.ysotodistajat
dc.subject.ysotodistelu
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16056
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21078
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17213
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12347
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9063
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16284
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3078
dc.rights.urlhttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.relation.doi10.1163/15718123-bja10082
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

In Copyright
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on In Copyright