Reasons for qualitative psychologists to share human data
Karhulahti, V. (2023). Reasons for qualitative psychologists to share human data. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(4), 1621-1634. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12573
Julkaistu sarjassa
British Journal of Social PsychologyTekijät
Päivämäärä
2023Tekijänoikeudet
© 2022 The Authors. British Journal of Social Psychology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Psychological Society.
Qualitative data sharing practices in psychology have not developed as rapidly as those in parallel quantitative domains. This is often explained by numerous epistemological, ethical and pragmatic issues concerning qualitative data types. In this article, I provide an alternative to the frequently expressed, often reasonable, concerns regarding the sharing of qualitative human data by highlighting three advantages of qualitative data sharing. I argue that sharing qualitative human data is not by default ‘less ethical’, ‘riskier’ and ‘impractical’ compared with quantitative data sharing, but in some cases more ethical, less risky and easier to manage for sharing because (1) informed consent can be discussed, negotiated and validated; (2) the shared data can be curated by special means; and (3) the privacy risks are mainly local instead of global. I hope this alternative perspective further encourages qualitative psychologists to share their data when it is epistemologically, ethically and pragmatically possible.
...
Julkaisija
WileyISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
0144-6665Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/155926379
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Rahoittaja(t)
Suomen Akatemia; Työsuojelurahasto; Euroopan komissioRahoitusohjelmat(t)
Huippuyksikkörahoitus, SA; Muut
The content of the publication reflects only the author’s view. The funder is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.
Lisätietoja rahoituksesta
This study received funding from Academy of Finland (312397) and the Finnish Work Environment Fund (200349). At the revision stage, the study received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon Europe research and innovation programme (grant agreement No 101042052).Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Sensitiivisen tutkimusprosessin eettinen suunnittelu
Hämeenaho, Pilvi; Väkeväinen, Nina (Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, 2022) -
Enhancing Ethical Research Participation and Inclusion of Marginalized Adult Migrant Learners : An Early Career Researcher's Perspective
Malessa, Eva (Freie Universität Berlin, 2023)With this article I aim to raise awareness of the underrepresentation of adult migrant learners with limited educational experience, so-called LESLLA (literacy education and second language learning for adults) learners, ... -
Towards a cybercontextual transmission model for online scamming
Tambe, Ebot Alain Claude; Siponen, Mikko; Topalli, Volkan (Taylor & Francis, 2023)This study focuses on advance fee fraud (AFF) scamming, a specific form of online deception in which scammers rely on social engineering techniques to deceive individuals into making advance payments to them. Several ... -
Tutkimusetiikka ja hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö
Fingerroos, Outi; Kokko, Marja (Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura, 2022) -
Facebook’s Emotional Contagion Experiment as a Challenge to Research Ethics
Jouhki, Jukka; Lauk, Epp; Penttinen, Maija; Sormanen, Niina; Uskali, Turo (Cogitatio Press, 2016)This article analyzes the ethical discussion focusing on the Facebook emotional contagion experiment published by the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2014. The massive-scale experiment manipulated the ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.