Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorLisboa, Sá Nogueira
dc.contributor.authorDomingos, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorVallius, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorLensu, Anssi
dc.contributor.authorMacamo, Ernesto
dc.contributor.authorSitoe, Almeida
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-04T12:08:50Z
dc.date.available2022-04-04T12:08:50Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLisboa, S. N., Domingos, F., Vallius, E., Lensu, A., Macamo, E., & Sitoe, A. (2022). Assessing the Impact of Road and Land Use on Species Diversity of Trees, Shrubs, Herbs and Grasses in the Mountain Landscape in Southern Africa. <i>Frontiers in Conservation Science</i>, <i>3</i>, Article 829690. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.829690" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fcosc.2022.829690</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_117569124
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/80478
dc.description.abstractMountain landscape, described as a global biodiversity hotspot due to high endemism, is threatened by land-use change, including management and modification of vegetation. However, there is little knowledge about how road and land use affect plant diversity in mountains landscapes, particularly in southern Africa. Previous studies have studied the impact of the road or land use on plant species diversity separately and have concentrated on a single plant species. Here we compare the plant diversity of regenerated trees, shrubs, herbaceous plant, and grasses among Forest, Fallow, Agriculture, and Road in the Moribane Forest Reserve (MFR), in Eastern Chimanimani Mountain landscape in Mozambique. To assess how land-use change affects plant diversity, we conducted 45 transects along the roadside and randomly established 24 quadrats in the Agriculture fields and Fallow and 26 quadrats in the pristine Forest. In each transect and quadrats, we recorded the occurrence of four plant life forms (regenerated trees, shrubs, herbaceous, and grass species) to determine the alpha and beta-diversity across land-uses, and we assessed the invasiveness of each species. Species composition varied significantly among the land-uses types. Roadside had higher species diversity and the highest number of invasive species (138 total species of all plant life forms; 31 invasive species), following Agriculture (72; 30), Fallow (81; 20), and Forest (78; 19). There was no similarity in species between roadsides and other landuses. Furthermore, roadside recorded the highest average species turnover for all plant life forms following Agriculture, Forest, and Fallow. Among the plants, the most important life form was herbaceous with 143 species, following grass with 86 species, shrubs with 86, and regenerated trees with 65 species. The land-use pattern makes the landscape more diversified in the study area and, as a result, increase the plant species richness and diversity by species replacement. This study is unique in collecting and analyzing data on different plant life forms on roadsides linked with a range of different land-use types within a small region of a mountain landscape in southern Africa.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Conservation Science
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otheralpha-diversity
dc.subject.otherbeta-diversity
dc.subject.otherconservation area
dc.subject.othertransport infrastructure
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity conservation
dc.subject.otherenvironmental impact assessment
dc.titleAssessing the Impact of Road and Land Use on Species Diversity of Trees, Shrubs, Herbs and Grasses in the Mountain Landscape in Southern Africa
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202204042157
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineYmpäristötiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEnvironmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2673-611X
dc.relation.volume3
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumberHEL7M0453-71
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysoluonnonsuojelualueet
dc.subject.ysomaankäyttö
dc.subject.ysotienrakennus
dc.subject.ysoluonnonsuojelu
dc.subject.ysovuoristot
dc.subject.ysokasvillisuus
dc.subject.ysomaisemansuojelu
dc.subject.ysovieraslajit
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1371
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6713
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6522
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4290
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1756
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2330
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23747
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.datasethttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcosc.2022.829690/full#supplementary-material
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fcosc.2022.829690
dc.relation.funderMinistry for Foreign Affairsen
dc.relation.funderUlkoministeriöfi
jyx.fundingprogramCIMO HEI-ICI HEI (Higher Education Institutions Institutional Cooperation Instrument)en
jyx.fundingprogramCIMO HEI-ICI HEI (Higher Education Institutions Institutional Cooperation Instrument)fi
jyx.fundinginformationThis work (SuMNature project, Number 21000038041) was funded with Finland's Ministry for Foreign Affairs support.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0