Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFabritius, Henna
dc.contributor.authorKnegt, Henrik de
dc.contributor.authorOvaskainen, Otso
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-28T09:31:23Z
dc.date.available2022-02-28T09:31:23Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationFabritius, H., Knegt, H. D., & Ovaskainen, O. (2021). Effects of a mobile disturbance pattern on dynamic patch networks and metapopulation persistence. <i>Ecological Modelling</i>, <i>460</i>, Article 109738. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109738</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_101218975
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/79983
dc.description.abstractMotivation Certain early-succession habitats may emerge only at restricted locations following disturbance. Therefore, whether disturbances tend to occur at certain sites or not can significantly affect habitat availability and metapopulation persistence of early-successional habitat specialists. Available models that combine metapopulation and landscape processes do not address how to model mobile, spatially shifting disturbance intensities independent of factors of site suitability. We present a model that allows the study on how a mobile disturbance pattern, of either natural or anthropogenic origin, affects patch network and metapopulation dynamics in realistic, heterogeneous landscapes. Methods We simulate metapopulation dynamics using a realistic landscape and varying patch destruction (and turnover) rates. We model the local patch emergence rate as the function of site suitability to patch emergence –a permanent factor–and local disturbance intensity, which we first estimate from empirical data and then simulate using annually updating spatial random fields. Using this model, we test whether and how a mobile disturbance pattern affects metapopulation persistence of the false heath fritillary butterfly (Melitaea diamina). Results In our case study, a mobile disturbance pattern caused new patches to emerge further away from occupied patches over time. This decreased the probability of new patches becoming colonized and thus impaired metapopulation persistence even when the median distance between patches appeared unchanging. However, if disturbances moved to areas that were highly suitable to patch emergence, increased habitat availability could compensate the otherwise detrimental effects of a mobile disturbance pattern. Disturbances that had a moderate degree of mobility had the most uncertain effects to metapopulation persistence. Conclusions Our modelling approach distinguishes between two processes behind the spatio-temporal pattern and rates of patch emergence–disturbance dynamics and varying site suitability. It enables the use of social and environmental data for forecasting habitat availability for early-succession habitat specialists under alternative future scenarios. It can be applied and developed further to suit multiple study systems. Our case study suggests that for species conservation, it is either beneficial to organize recurring management activities to take place at constant locations, or to gradually shift them towards areas that are highly suitable to patch emergence.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcological Modelling
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherHabitat dynamics
dc.subject.otherMetapopulation dynamics
dc.subject.otherHabitat suitability models
dc.subject.otherMetapopulation models
dc.subject.otherThe false heath fritillary
dc.subject.otherMelitaea diamina
dc.titleEffects of a mobile disturbance pattern on dynamic patch networks and metapopulation persistence
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202202281707
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0304-3800
dc.relation.volume460
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.subject.ysohabitaatti
dc.subject.ysometapopulaatiot
dc.subject.ysopopulaatiodynamiikka
dc.subject.ysotummaverkkoperhonen
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5678
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24378
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23558
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14841
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2021.109738
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was supported by the Academy of Finland [grant numbers 129,636 and 250,444], Emil Aaltonen Foundation, Societas Pro-Fauna et Flora Fennica and the South Ostrobothnia and Southwest Finland Centres for Economic Development, Transport and the Environment. OO was supported by the Academy of Finland (grants 284,601 and 309,581), Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation, and the Research Council of Norway through its Centres of Excellence Funding Scheme (223,257) via Centre for Biodiversity Dynamics.
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0