When did biopolitics begin? : Actuality and potentiality in historical events
Prozorov, S. (2022). When did biopolitics begin? : Actuality and potentiality in historical events. European Journal of Social Theory, 25(4), 539-558. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310221077198
Julkaistu sarjassa
European Journal of Social TheoryTekijät
Päivämäärä
2022Tekijänoikeudet
© 2022 the Author
The article addresses the ongoing debate about the origins of biopolitics. While Foucault’s analysis of biopolitics approached it as a modern rationality of government, Agamben’s Homo Sacer series presented biopolitics as having a longer provenance, dating back to the antiquity. These polar positions are not mutually exclusive but coexist in these and other theories of biopolitics, which approach its object as both modern and ancient, having its chronological origin in the eighteenth to nineteenth centuries yet also possessing a prehistory of precursors. The article interprets this dual origin in terms of Paolo Virno’s theory of historical temporality, which distinguishes between the chronological past of historical events and their potential past, which accompanies and is negated in them. Coexisting with its own unrealized potential, every historical event remains incomplete and extends itself both backwards and forwards, positing its precursors and prefiguring its future outcomes. While modern in the chronological sense, biopolitics is retrospectively inscribed in a longer historical lineage, its antecedents easily identifiable in the history of political thought. Finally, we apply this approach to Virno’s own account of the history of biopolitics, questioning his identification of past potential with labour-power.
...
Julkaisija
SAGE PublicationsISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
1368-4310Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/104165077
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Lisätietoja rahoituksesta
The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Introduction
Backman, Jussi; Cimino, Antonio (Oxford University Press, 2022)In the introduction to the volume, the editors explain the overarching aim of the volume and contextualize the main themes of its chapters. Even if the notions of biopolitics and biopower have played a crucial role in ... -
Was Thomas Hobbes the first biopolitical thinker?
Lindholm, Samuel (SAGE Publications, 2023)Thomas Hobbes's name often comes up as scholars debate the history of biopower, which regulates the biological life of individual bodies and entire populations. This article examines whether and to what extent Hobbes may ... -
Giorgio Agamben’s Critique of the Covid-19 Response has Little to Do with Biopolitics
Lindholm, Samuel (Routledge, 2024)Giorgio Agamben claims that the aggressive coronavirus response in Italy turned the nation’s entire population into formless bare life, which was cast out from meaningful human existence through a sovereign exception. This ... -
Luther and Biopower : Rethinking the Reformation with Foucault
Lindholm, Samuel; Di Carlo, Andrea (Copenhagen Business School, 2024)In this article, we propose an alternative Foucauldian reading of Martin Luther’s thought and early Lutheranism. Michel Foucault did not mention the Reformation often, although he saw it as an amplification of pastoral ... -
Bene vivere politice : On the (Meta)biopolitics of “Happiness”
Backman, Jussi (Oxford University Press, 2022)This chapter approaches the question of biopolitics in ancient political thought looking not at specific political techniques but at notions of the final aim of the political community. It argues that the “happiness” ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.