Developing an open science ‘mindset’
Hagger, M. S. (2022). Developing an open science ‘mindset’. Health Psychology and Behavioral Medicine, 10(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/21642850.2021.2012474
Julkaistu sarjassa
Health Psychology and Behavioral MedicineTekijät
Päivämäärä
2022Tekijänoikeudet
© 2022 the Authors
Background: Identification of widespread biases present in reported research findings in many scientific disciplines, including psychology, such as failures to replicate and the likely extensive application of questionable research practices, has raised serious concerns over the reliability and trustworthiness of scientific research. This has led to the development of, and advocacy for, ‘open science’ practices, including data, materials, analysis, and output sharing, pre-registration of study predictions and analysis plans, and increased access to published research findings. Implementation of such practices has been enthusiastic in some quarters, but literacy in, and adoption of, these practices has lagged behind among many researchers in the scientific community.
Advances: In the current article I propose that researchers adopt an open science ‘mindset’, a comprehensive approach to open science predicated on researchers’ operating under the basic assumption that, wherever possible, open science practices will be a central component of all steps of their research projects. The primary, defining feature of the mindset is a commitment to open science principles in all research projects from inception to dissemination. Other features of the mindset include the assumption that all components of research projects (e.g. pre-registered hypotheses, protocols, materials, analysis plans, data, and output) will be accessible broadly; pro-active selection of open fora to disseminate research components and findings; open and transparent dissemination of reports of the research findings in advance of, and after, formal publication; and active promotion of open science practices through education, modeling, and advocacy.
Conclusion: The open science mindset is a ‘farm to fork’ approach to open science aimed at promoting comprehensive quality in application of open science, and widening participation in open science practices so that they become the norm in research in health psychology and behavioral medicine going forward.
...
Julkaisija
Taylor & FrancisISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2164-2850Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/103520149
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- Liikuntatieteiden tiedekunta [3141]
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
The Finnish Open Science and Research Initiative and Development of Green Open Access in Finland
Olsbo, Pekka (2016)Presentation in Slovakian Open Government Week, Bratislava, 19.10.2016 -
Validity and Transparency in Quantifying Open-Ended Data
Conry-Murray, Clare; Waltzer, Tal; DeBernardi, Fiona C.; Fossum, Jessica L.; Haasova, Simona; Matthews, Michael S.; O’Mahony, Aoife; Moreau, David; Baum, Myriam A.; Karhulahti, Veli-Matti; McCarthy, Randy J.; Paterson, Helena M.; McSweeney, Kara; Elsherif, Mahmoud M. (SAGE Publications, 2024)Quantitatively coding open-ended data (e.g., from videos, interviews) can be a rich source of information in psychological research, but reporting practices vary substantially. We provide strategies for improving validity ... -
Quality management of research, development and innovation activities in Finnish universities of applied sciences
Kajaste, Matti (Taylor & Francis, 2018)This study utilises the quality audit reports of Finnish Universities of Applied Sciences to describe the quality management of their research, development and innovation activities (RDI). The institutions are trying ... -
Transparency in development communication
Virtanen, Jarna (2014)Tämän tutkimuksen tavoitteena oli selvittää avoimuuden ja läpinäkyvyyden merkitystä kehitysyhteistyöhön liittyvässä viestinnässä. Tutkimus tarkastelee läpinäkyvyyden roolia kehitysviestinnässä monista näkökulmista ja ... -
Transparency of peer review : a semi-structured interview study with chief editors from social sciences and humanities
Karhulahti, Veli-Matti; Backe, Hans-Joachim (BioMed Central, 2021)Background Open peer review practices are increasing in medicine and life sciences, but in social sciences and humanities (SSH) they are still rare. We aimed to map out how editors of respected SSH journals perceive open ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.