Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorRantamo, Krista
dc.contributor.authorArola, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorAroviita, Jukka
dc.contributor.authorHämälainen, Heikki
dc.contributor.authorHannula, Maija
dc.contributor.authorLaaksonen, Rami
dc.contributor.authorLaamanen, Tiina
dc.contributor.authorLeppänen, Matti T.
dc.contributor.authorSalmelin, Johanna
dc.contributor.authorSyrjänen, Jukka T.
dc.contributor.authorTaskinen, Antti
dc.contributor.authorTurunen, Jarno
dc.contributor.authorEkholm, Petri
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-30T06:07:40Z
dc.date.available2021-11-30T06:07:40Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationRantamo, K., Arola, H., Aroviita, J., Hämälainen, H., Hannula, M., Laaksonen, R., Laamanen, T., Leppänen, M. T., Salmelin, J., Syrjänen, J. T., Taskinen, A., Turunen, J., & Ekholm, P. (2022). Risk Assessment of Gypsum Amendment on Agricultural Fields : Effects of Sulfate on Riverine Biota. <i>Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry</i>, <i>41</i>(1), 108-121. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5248</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_102252339
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/78823
dc.description.abstractGypsum (CaSO4 ∙ 2H2O) amendment is a promising way of decreasing the phosphorus loading of arable lands, and of thus preventing aquatic eutrophication. However, in freshwaters with low sulfate concentrations, gypsum-released sulfate may pose a threat to the biota. To assess such risks, we performed a series of sulfate toxicity tests in the laboratory and conducted field surveys. These field surveys were associated with a large-scale pilot exercise involving spreading gypsum on agricultural fields covering 18% of the Savijoki River catchment area. The gypsum amendment in such fields resulted in about fourfold increase in the mean sulfate concentration for a 2-month period, and a transient, early peak reaching about 220 mg/L. The sulfate concentration gradually decreased almost to the pre-gypsum level after 3 years. Laboratory experiments with Unio crassus mussels and gypsum-spiked river water showed significant effects on the foot movement activity, which was more intense with the highest sulfate concentration (1,100 mg/L) than with the control. The survival of the glochidia after 24 and 48 h exposure was not significantly affected by the sulfate concentrations up to 1,000 mg/L. Neither was the length growth of the moss Fontinalis antipyretica affected. The field studies on benthic algal biomass accrual, mussel and fish density, and Salmo trutta embryo survival did not show gypsum amendment effects. Gypsum treatment did not raise the sulfate concentrations even to a level just close to critical for the biota studied. However, as the effects of sulfate are dependent on both the spatial and temporal contexts, we advocate water quality and biota monitoring with proper temporal and spatial control in rivers within gypsum treatment areas.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherItämeri
dc.subject.othergypsum
dc.subject.otherBaltic Sea
dc.subject.othersulfate
dc.titleRisk Assessment of Gypsum Amendment on Agricultural Fields : Effects of Sulfate on Riverine Biota
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202111305828
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineAkvaattiset tieteetfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineYmpäristötiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineAquatic Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEnvironmental Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange108-121
dc.relation.issn0730-7268
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume41
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.subject.ysokipsi
dc.subject.ysosulfaatit
dc.subject.ysomaanparannusaineet
dc.subject.ysopellot
dc.subject.ysoympäristövaikutukset
dc.subject.ysovesistönkuormitus
dc.subject.ysoympäristöriskit
dc.subject.ysovesistövaikutukset
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15722
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13742
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2119
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6431
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9862
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8045
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7749
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17886
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1002/etc.5248
jyx.fundinginformationThis study was part of the SAVE and NutriTrade projects financed by the Finnish Ministry of Environment and the EU Central Baltic Program, respectively.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0