Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKarvonen, Kati
dc.contributor.authorNykky, Jonna
dc.contributor.authorMarjomäki, Varpu
dc.contributor.authorGilbert, Leona
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-19T05:18:45Z
dc.date.available2021-10-19T05:18:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationKarvonen, K., Nykky, J., Marjomäki, V., & Gilbert, L. (2021). Distinctive Evasion Mechanisms to Allow Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Different Human Cell Lines. <i>Frontiers in Microbiology</i>, <i>12</i>, Article 711291. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.711291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.711291</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_101531159
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/78248
dc.description.abstractLyme borreliosis is a multisystemic disease caused by the pleomorphic bacteria of the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato complex. The exact mechanisms for the infection to progress into a prolonged sequelae of the disease are currently unknown, although immune evasion and persistence of the bacteria in the host are thought to be major contributors. The current study investigated B. burgdorferi infection processes in two human cell lines, both non-immune and non-phagocytic, to further understand the mechanisms of infection of this bacterium. By utilizing light, confocal, helium ion, and transmission electron microscopy, borrelial infection of chondrosarcoma (SW1353) and dermal fibroblast (BJ) cells were examined from an early 30-min time point to a late 9-days post-infection. Host cell invasion, viability of both the host and B. burgdorferi, as well as, co-localization with lysosomes and the presence of different borrelial pleomorphic forms were analyzed. The results demonstrated differences of infection between the cell lines starting from early entry as B. burgdorferi invaded BJ cells in coiled forms with less pronounced host cell extensions, whereas in SW1353 cells, micropodial interactions with spirochetes were always seen. Moreover, infection of BJ cells increased in a dose dependent manner throughout the examined 9 days, while the percentage of infection, although dose dependent, decreased in SW1353 cells after reaching a peak at 48 h. Furthermore, blebs, round body and damaged B. burgdorferi forms, were mostly observed from the infected SW1353 cells, while spirochetes dominated in BJ cells. Both infected host cell lines grew and remained viable after 9 day post-infection. Although damaged forms were noticed in both cell lines, co-localization with lysosomes was low in both cell lines, especially in BJ cells. The invasion of non-phagocytic cells and the lack of cytopathic effects onto the host cells by B. burgdorferi indicated one mechanism of immune evasion for the bacteria. The differences in attachment, pleomorphic form expressions, and the lack of lysosomal involvement between the infected host cells likely explain the ability of a bacterium to adapt to different environments, as well as, a strategy for persistence inside a host.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherFrontiers Research Foundation
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFrontiers in Microbiology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherlyme borreliosis
dc.subject.otherpleomorphic forms
dc.subject.otherimmune evasion
dc.subject.othermicroscopy
dc.subject.otherpersist
dc.titleDistinctive Evasion Mechanisms to Allow Persistence of Borrelia burgdorferi in Different Human Cell Lines
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202110195277
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSolu- ja molekyylibiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineNanoscience Centerfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineCell and Molecular Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineNanoscience Centeren
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1664-302X
dc.relation.volume12
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 Karvonen, Nykky, Marjomäki and Gilbert.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoimmuunivaste
dc.subject.ysobakteerit
dc.subject.ysoborrelioosi
dc.subject.ysotaudinaiheuttajat
dc.subject.ysomikroskopia
dc.subject.ysoborrelioosi
dc.subject.ysoisäntäsolut
dc.subject.ysovirukset
dc.subject.ysoinfektiot
dc.subject.ysoimmuunijärjestelmä
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21599
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1749
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13975
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8822
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16290
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13976
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27923
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1123
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7316
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16041
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.3389/fmicb.2021.711291
jyx.fundinginformationThis study was funded by the Schwartz Foundation.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0