On the measurement of visual distraction potential of in-car activities
Julkaistu sarjassa
JYU DissertationsTekijät
Päivämäärä
2021Tekijänoikeudet
© The Author & University of Jyväskylä
People use various applications from Instagram to Netflix while driving. Previous literature recognizes the harmful effects of conducting these secondary in-car tasks while driving. As a general discovery, studies indicate an association between secondary in-car task activities and drivers’ visual inattention which is further associated with accidents in traffic. One solution to diminish visual inattention could be to design the user interfaces of the applications to be low-demanding visually and cognitively. However, there is little published data on the exact design factors that could enable such user interface design. There are certain vital issues that complicate studying visual inattention and user interfaces’ distraction potential: there is no commonly agreed definition for driver inattention. The lack of an agreed definition leads to difficulties in operationalizing and measuring visual inattention reliably. To be able to define driver inattention, we should first better understand the attentional demands of driving. A more comprehensive understanding of attentional demands of driving could provide instruments that conquer these issues and enable the measurement of visual inattention and examination of the design factors mitigating drivers’ visual inattention to enhance traffic safety. Hence, this doctoral dissertation aims to clarify a definition of attentive driving, develop a more reliable method to measure visual inattention, and finally, better understand how user interface design factors affect drivers’ visual inattention. This doctoral dissertation makes the following main contributions: a) a suggestion for a working definition of attentive driving, b) an operationalization of visual distraction, c) development of a testing method that assesses tested tasks’ visual distraction potential against a baseline of attentive driving and takes drivers’ individual glancing behaviors into account, and d) an extension of knowledge concerning the effects of user interface design factors on visual distraction potential. These benefit the traffic research community by helping develop a definition for attentive driving and driver inattention and providing a suggestion of how drivers’ visual inattention can be operationalized and measured more reliably. Also, the implications concerning user interface design benefit the automotive industry and designers working within the industry.
...
Julkaisija
Jyväskylän yliopistoISBN
978-951-39-8841-8ISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
2489-9003Julkaisuun sisältyy osajulkaisuja
- Artikkeli I: Grahn, H., Kujala, T., Silvennoinen, J., Leppänen, A., & Saariluoma, P. (2020). Expert drivers’ prospective thinking-aloud to enhance automated driving technologies – Investigating uncertainty and anticipation in traffic. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 146, 105717. DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105717
- Artikkeli II: Grahn, H., & Taipalus, T. (2021). Refining distraction potential testing guidelines by considering differences in glancing behavior. Transportation Research. Part F : Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 79, 23-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.009
- Artikkeli III: Kujala, T., Grahn, H., Mäkelä, J., & Lasch, A. (2016). On the Visual Distraction Effects of Audio-Visual Route Guidance. In P. Green, S. Boll, G. Burnett, J. Gabbard, & S. Osswald (Eds.), AutomotiveUI 2016 : Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 169-176). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3003715.3005421. JYX: jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/57928
- Artikkeli IV: Kujala, T., & Grahn, H. (2017). Visual distraction effects of in-car text entry methods : Comparing keyboard, handwriting and voice recognition. In S. Boll, B. Pfleging, B. Donmez, I. Politis, & D. Large (Eds.), AutomotiveUI '17 : Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (pp. 1-10). ACM. DOI: 10.1145/3122986.3122987. JYX: jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/55620
- Artikkeli V: Grahn, H., & Kujala, T. (2018). Visual Distraction Effects between In-Vehicle Tasks with a Smartphone and a Motorcycle Helmet-Mounted Head-Up Display. In Academic MindTrek'18 : Proceedings of the 22nd International Academic MindTrek Conference (pp. 153-162). Association for Computing Machinery. DOI: 10.1145/3275116.3275134. JYX: jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/60811
- Artikkeli VI: Grahn, H., & Kujala, T. (2020). Impacts of Touch Screen Size, User Interface Design, and Subtask Boundaries on In-Car Task's Visual Demand and Driver Distraction. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 142, Article 102467. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2020.102467. JYX: jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69650
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
- JYU Dissertations [852]
- Väitöskirjat [3578]
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Refining distraction potential testing guidelines by considering differences in glancing behavior
Grahn, Hilkka; Taipalus, Toni (Elsevier, 2021)Driver distraction is a recognized cause of traffic accidents. Although the well-known guidelines for measuring distraction of secondary in-car tasks were published by the United States National Highway Traffic Safety ... -
Measuring Distraction at the Levels of Tactical and Strategic Control: The Limits of Capacity-Based Measures for Revealing Unsafe Visual Sampling Models
Kujala, Tuomo; Saariluoma, Pertti (Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2011)The control theory of driving suggests that driver distraction can be analyzed as a breakdown of control at three levels. Common approach for analyzing distraction experimentally is to utilize capacity-based measures to ... -
Visual distraction effects of in-car text entry methods : Comparing keyboard, handwriting and voice recognition
Kujala, Tuomo; Grahn, Hilkka (ACM, 2017)Three text entry methods were compared in a driving simulator study with 17 participants. Ninety-seven drivers’ occlusion distance (OD) data mapped on the test routes was used as a baseline to evaluate the methods’ ... -
Impacts of Touch Screen Size, User Interface Design, and Subtask Boundaries on In-Car Task's Visual Demand and Driver Distraction
Grahn, Hilkka; Kujala, Tuomo (Elsevier, 2020)Visual distraction by secondary in-car tasks is a major contributing factor in traffic incidents. In-car user interface design may mitigate these negative effects but to accomplish this, design factors’ visual distraction ... -
On the Visual Distraction Effects of Audio-Visual Route Guidance
Kujala, Tuomo; Grahn, Hilkka; Mäkelä, Jakke; Lasch, Annegret (Association for Computing Machinery, 2016)This is the first controlled quantitative analysis on the visual distraction effects of audio-visual route guidance in simulated, but ecologically realistic driving scenarios with dynamic maneuvers and self-controlled ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.