Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorKilponen, Kiia
dc.contributor.authorHuhtala, Mari
dc.contributor.authorKinnunen, Ulla
dc.contributor.authorMauno, Saija
dc.contributor.authorFeldt,Taru
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-14T12:31:35Z
dc.date.available2021-04-14T12:31:35Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationKilponen, K., Huhtala, M., Kinnunen, U., Mauno, S., & Feldt, T. (2021). Illegitimate tasks in health care : illegitimate task types and associations with occupational well‐being. <i>Journal of Clinical Nursing</i>, <i>30</i>(13-14), 2093-2106. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15767" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15767</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_66366623
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/75059
dc.description.abstractAims and objectives The aims of the study were to identify content categories of unreasonable and unnecessary illegitimate tasks and to investigate how unreasonable and unnecessary tasks relate to occupational wellbeing. Background Illegitimate tasks are a common stressor among healthcare professionals, and they have been shown to have negative associations with occupational well‐being. Despite this evidence, research has not yet uncovered what kinds of tasks healthcare professionals consider illegitimate. Design and method The data gathered by means of an online survey consisted of 1024 municipal healthcare organisation employees. A theory‐driven qualitative content analysis was used to analyse freely reported illegitimate tasks. For occupational well‐being associations, a mixed‐methods approach was used (ANCOVA and linear regression analysis). The STROBE statement—checklist for cross‐sectional studies was used. Results Eight content categories were found for illegitimate tasks. For unreasonable tasks, these were (1) tasks outside one's occupational role (78% of all unreasonable tasks), (2) conflicting or unclear demands (9%), (3) tasks with insufficient resources (8%) and (4) tasks with difficult consequences (5%), and for unnecessary tasks, these were (1) impractical or outdated working habits (31% of all unnecessary tasks), (2) tasks related to dysfunctional technology (30%), (3) unnecessary procedures (27%) and (4) tasks related to bureaucratic demands (12%). Unreasonable and unnecessary tasks were associated with higher levels of burnout and lower work engagement and the meaningfulness of work. Conclusions Our findings support the theory that illegitimate tasks are an occupational stressor with negative effects on burnout, work engagement and meaningfulness of work. Relevance to clinical practice The study offers insights into the types of tasks health care employees see as illegitimate and highlights the importance of good job design in promoting occupational well‐being in health care.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Clinical Nursing
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherburnout
dc.subject.otherillegitimate tasks
dc.subject.othermeaningfulness of work
dc.subject.othernurses
dc.subject.otherwork engagement
dc.titleIllegitimate tasks in health care : illegitimate task types and associations with occupational well‐being
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202104142371
dc.contributor.laitosPsykologian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Psychologyen
dc.contributor.oppiainePsykologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineHyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineKäyttäytymisen muutos, hyvinvointi ja terveys elämänkulussafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineTyön ja johtamisen muuttuminen digitaalisessa ajassafi
dc.contributor.oppiainePsychologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Wellbeingen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBehaviour change, health, and well-being across the lifespanen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEmergent work in the digital eraen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange2093-2106
dc.relation.issn0962-1067
dc.relation.numberinseries13-14
dc.relation.volume30
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber308336
dc.subject.ysouupumus
dc.subject.ysomielekkyys
dc.subject.ysotyön sisältö
dc.subject.ysohoitotyö
dc.subject.ysotyöhyvinvointi
dc.subject.ysotehtävät
dc.subject.ysoterveydenhuoltohenkilöstö
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p130
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14869
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1833
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10684
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p1835
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3929
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2366
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1111/jocn.15767
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Project, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiahanke, SAfi
jyx.fundinginformationAcademy of Finland. Grant Numbers: 308336, 308334. Foundation for Municipal Development
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0