The implementation of the Finnish national plan for foreign language teaching
Authors
Date
1992The present study is based on a two-part research report dealing with foreign language education and its relevance in the Finnish educational system. This review focuses on the national plan for foreign language teaching and its implementation. In this study, macro- and micro-implementation processes are described, and factors influencing implementation of the national plan for foreign language teaching are examined. The national plan is socially relevant because it is based on the needs of society. Target groups, ie. students and parents, have the right, as guaranteed by the legislature, to make language choices. These choices are based on the personal relevance of language education. The macro-implementation of the national plan for language teaching proved to be successful. All the language programs, beginning from the national level down to the municipal level, are consistent with the national plan. The micro-implementation of the plan is successful only in part. The reasons for the difficulties in the implementation of the municipal language programs are sought by means of questionnaires administered to local educational authorities, comprehensive school and upper secondary school students, and their parents. The results indicate that students, parents and educational administration authorities do not consider the present language education in comprehensive schools and upper secondary schools as relevant. The motives to choose a language depend on student's plans, their previous experiences of languages and language studies, and on pressures and incentives on them. Parents choose a language starting in the third grade, primarily, on the basis of the child's own wishes. Relevant language education is defined by students, parents and educational administration authorities.
...
ISBN
978-951-39-8528-8Keywords
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- Väitöskirjat [3599]
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
”Englanti jyrää” : kieltenopettajien keinoja ja ehdotuksia kielivalintojen monipuolistamiseksi
Veivo, Outi; Pollari, Pirjo; Toomar, Jaana; Mäntylä, Katja (Helsingin yliopisto, 2021)Suomen kouluissa opiskellaan yhä vähemmän ja yhä harvempia vieraita kieliä. Valinnaisten kielten opiskelun suosio on laskenut, ja kielitaito on vaarassa jäädä pelkän englannin varaan. Erilaisia toimenpiteitä, kuten kielen ... -
“I could learn more words” : involving stakeholders in defining L2 English reading constructs in diagnostic and dynamic assessment
Leontjev, Dmitri; Huhta, Ari; Koskela, Kristina (Suomen soveltavan kielitieteen yhdistys, 2024)There has been a growing effort to combine two L2 (second/foreign language) assessment frameworks that aim to promote student learning but have different theoretical roots – diagnostic and dynamic assessment. This paper ... -
Ehdotuksia kieltenopetuksen kehittämiseksi
Heikkola, Leena Maria; Alisaari, Jenni; Harju-Autti, Raisa; Björklund, Mikaela (Suomen kieltenopettajien liitto, 2024)Kielivarannon vahvistamiseen tarvitaan pitkäjänteinen strategia ja laajaa yhteistyötä. -
Kielikoulutus murroksessa : media ja vanhemmat kielenopetuksen varhentamisen äärellä
Mård-Miettinen, Karita; Pitkänen-Huhta, Anne (Oulun yliopisto, 2022) -
The meaningfulness of two curriculum-based national tests of English as a foreign language
Hilden, Raili; Pulkkinen, Jonna; Rautopuro, Juhani (Association for Language Testing and Assessment of Australia and New Zealand, 2022)This paper addresses the aspect of the meaningfulness of a national assessment in English as a foreign language, applying the fairness framework proposed by Kunnan (2018). We compared students’ performance on two receptive ...