Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGao, Ying
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Neil
dc.contributor.authorNevala, Nina
dc.contributor.authorFinni Juutinen, Taija
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T11:51:56Z
dc.date.available2020-09-03T11:51:56Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGao, Y., Cronin, N., Nevala, N., & Finni Juutinen, T. (2020). Validity of long-term and short-term recall of occupational sitting time in Finnish and Chinese office workers. <i>Journal of Sport and Health Science</i>, <i>9</i>(4), 345-351. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2017.06.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2017.06.003</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_27095184
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_74307
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71627
dc.description.abstractBackground As sedentary behavior is a global health issue, there is a need for methods of self-reported sitting assessment. The accuracy and reliability of these methods should also be tested in various populations and different cultural contexts. This study examined the validity of long-term and short-term recall of occupational sitting time in Finnish and Chinese subgroups. Methods Two cohort groups of office-based workers (58.6% female, age range 22–67 years) participated: a Finnish group (FIN, n = 34) and a Chinese group (CHI, n = 36). Long-term (past 3-month sitting) and short-term (daily sitting assessed on 5 consecutive days) single-item measures were used to assess self-reported occupational sitting time. Values from each participant were compared to objectively measured occupational sitting time assessed via thigh-mounted accelerometers, with Spearman's rho (ρ) used to assess validity and the Bland-Altman method used to evaluate agreement. Coefficients of variation depicted day-to-day variability of time spent on sitting at work. Results In the total study sample, the results showed that both long-term and short-term recall correlated with accelerometer-derived sitting time (ρ = 0.532, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.336–0.684, p < 0.001; ρ = 0.533, 95%CI: 0.449–0.607, p < 0.001, respectively). Compared to objectively measured sitting time, self-reported occupational sitting time was 2.4% (95%CI: −0.5% to 5.3%, p = 0.091) and 2.2% (95%CI: 0.7%–3.6%, p = 0.005) greater for long-term and short-term recall, respectively. The agreement level was within the range −21.2% to 25.9% for long-term recall, and −24.2% to 28.5% for short-term recall. During a 5-day work week, day-to-day variation of sitting time was 9.4% ± 11.4% according to short-term recall and 10.4% ± 8.4% according to accelerometry-derived occupational sitting time. Conclusion Overall, both long-term and short-term self-reported instruments provide acceptable measures of occupational sitting time in an office-based workplace, but their utility at the individual level is limited due to large variability.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Sport and Health Science
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otheraccelerometry
dc.subject.otherdaily recall
dc.subject.otherquestionnaire
dc.subject.otherself-report
dc.subject.othersitting time
dc.titleValidity of long-term and short-term recall of occupational sitting time in Finnish and Chinese office workers
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202008065494
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomekaniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomechanicsen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2020-08-06T06:15:07Z
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange345-351
dc.relation.issn2095-2546
dc.relation.numberinseries4
dc.relation.volume9
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Shanghai University of Sport
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysomittauslaitteet
dc.subject.ysoistuminen
dc.subject.ysoistumatyö
dc.subject.ysomittaus
dc.subject.ysotoimistotyöntekijät
dc.subject.ysotoimistotyö
dc.subject.ysovaliditeetti
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3583
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13022
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11787
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4794
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p18301
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17681
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19898
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.jshs.2017.06.003
jyx.fundinginformationYing Gao was supported by the China Scholarship Council (No.201206320092),


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0