Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorDuflot, Rémi
dc.contributor.authorTriviño, Mária
dc.contributor.authorBlattert, Clemens
dc.contributor.authorPotterf, Mária
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-27T09:04:33Z
dc.date.available2020-07-27T09:04:33Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEyvindson, K., Duflot, R., Triviño, M., Blattert, C., Potterf, M., & Mönkkönen, M. (2021). High boreal forest multifunctionality requires continuous cover forestry as a dominant management. <i>Land Use Policy</i>, <i>100</i>, 104918. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104918" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104918</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_41629791
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71238
dc.description.abstractIntensive extraction of forest resources lowers biodiversity and endangers the functioning of forest ecosystems. As such, alternative management regimes have emerged, aspiring to promote forest biodiversity and nature protection in managed forests. Among them, continuous cover forestry, (i.e. selective logging), has received considerable attention and is being promoted by some researchers and NGOs. Yet, the full consequences of banning clear-cuts (i.e. rotation forestry) and replacing it entirely with continuous cover forest remains uncertain. We explore how restricting forest management alternatives (either rotation forestry or continuous cover forestry) will affect landscape-scale forest multifunctionality at a range of harvesting levels. We evaluate multifunctionality as a combination of recreational ecosystem services, climate change mitigation, habitat availability for vertebrates, and red-listed dead wood dependent species. Our results show that restricting forest management alternatives have a negative impact on forest multifunctionality at all harvesting levels when compared to the case with no restrictions. Using only continuous cover forestry management alternatives resulted in higher multifunctionality than the case when only rotation forestry management alternatives were used. We also show that maximizing multifunctionality using all management alternatives led to high proportion of continuous cover forestry over the landscape. We conclude that banning clear-cuts does not promote forest biodiversity and multifunctionality at the landscape scale, especially if there is a requirement for high economic benefits from the forest. However, we recommend that continuous cover forestry should be considered as a primary management alternative, with selective application of rotation forestry wisely planned at the landscape scale.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLand Use Policy
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.otherclimate change mitigation
dc.subject.othercontinuous cover forestry
dc.subject.otherecosystem services
dc.subject.otherforest planning
dc.subject.otheroptimization
dc.titleHigh boreal forest multifunctionality requires continuous cover forestry as a dominant management
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202007275388
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange104918
dc.relation.issn0264-8377
dc.relation.volume100
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumber326321
dc.relation.grantnumber326309
dc.relation.grantnumber275329
dc.relation.grantnumber302/03.02.06/2017
dc.subject.ysooptimointi
dc.subject.ysoekosysteemipalvelut
dc.subject.ysoilmastonmuutokset
dc.subject.ysometsänhoito
dc.subject.ysoluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13477
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24628
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5729
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7534
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5497
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104918
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderResearch Council of Finlanden
dc.relation.funderMinistry of Agriculture and Forestryen
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderSuomen Akatemiafi
dc.relation.funderMaa- ja metsätalousministeriöfi
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET Programmesen
jyx.fundingprogramJoint International Project, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramAcademy Project, AoFen
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET Programmesen
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET, artikla 174 -ohjelmatfi
jyx.fundingprogramKV-yhteishanke, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramAkatemiahanke, SAfi
jyx.fundingprogramERA-NET, artikla 174 -ohjelmatfi
jyx.fundinginformationThis work was supported by the Finnish Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and by the European Union through the programs ERA-NET SumForest program (project: FutureBioEcon — Sustainable future of European Forests for developing the bioeconomy, Forest Values (project MultiForest - Management for multifunctionality in European forests in the era of bioeconomy), and Biodiversa (project: BioESSHealth - Scenarios for biodiversity and ecosystem services acknowledging health), and through the the Academy of Finland (project number 275329). We thank members of the BERG team (www.jyu.fi/berg) for their comments on the manuscript. RD and MT were supported by postdoctoral fellowships from the Kone Foundation.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY-NC-ND 4.0