Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorSaariluoma, Pertti
dc.contributor.editorAhram, Tareq
dc.contributor.editorTaiar, Redha
dc.contributor.editorGremeaux-Bader, Vincent
dc.contributor.editorAminian, Kamiar
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-30T09:41:57Z
dc.date.available2020-04-30T09:41:57Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSaariluoma, P. (2020). Hume’s Guillotine in Designing Ethically Intelligent Technologies. In T. Ahram, R. Taiar, V. Gremeaux-Bader, & K. Aminian (Eds.), <i>Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications II : Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies : Future Applications (IHIET – AI 2020)</i> (pp. 10-15). Springer. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 1152. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44267-5_2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44267-5_2</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_35165798
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/68791
dc.description.abstractIntelligent machines can follow ethical rules in their behaviour. However, it is less clear whether intelligent systems can also create new ethical principles. The former position can be called weak ethical AI and the latter strong ethical AI. Hume’s guillotine which claims that one cannot derive values from facts appears to be a fundamental obstacle to strong ethical AI. The analysis of human ethical information processes provides clarity to the possibility of strong ethical AI. Human ethical information processing begins with positive of negative emotions associated to situations. Situations can be seen as consequences of actions and for this reason people can define rules about acceptability of typical actions. Finally, socio-ethical discourse create general ethical rules. Intelligent systems can provide important support in ethical process and thus the difference between weak and strong ethical AI is polar.en
dc.format.extent706
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofHuman Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications II : Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies : Future Applications (IHIET – AI 2020)
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAdvances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.otherinteraction design
dc.subject.otherintelligent systems
dc.subject.otherethical design
dc.subject.otherHume’s guillotine
dc.titleHume’s Guillotine in Designing Ethically Intelligent Technologies
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202004302999
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineKognitiotiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineCognitive Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper
dc.relation.isbn978-3-030-44266-8
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_5794
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange10-15
dc.relation.issn2194-5357
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Human Interaction and Emerging Technologies
dc.subject.ysojärjestelmäsuunnittelu
dc.subject.ysoälytekniikka
dc.subject.ysoeettisyys
dc.subject.ysotekoäly
dc.subject.ysoetiikka
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p28347
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27260
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23085
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2616
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3166
dc.rights.urlhttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.relation.doi10.1007/978-3-030-44267-5_2
jyx.fundinginformationNo funding information.
dc.type.okmA4


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

In Copyright
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on In Copyright