Hume’s Guillotine Resolved
Saariluoma, P. (2020). Hume’s Guillotine Resolved. In M. Rauterberg (Ed.), Culture and Computing. 8th International Conference, C&C 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings (pp. 123-132). Springer. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 12215. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50267-6_10
Published inLecture Notes in Computer Science
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020
According to Hume’s guillotine, one cannot derive values from facts. Since intelligent systems are fact processors, one can ask how ethical machines can be possible. However, ethics is a real-life process. People analyze actions and situations emotionally and cognitively. Thus they learn rules, such as “this situation feels good/bad.” The cognitive analysis of actions is associated with emotional analysis. The association of action, emotion and cognition can be termed a primary ethical schema. Through an ethical information process in which emotions and cognitions interact in social discourse, primary ethical schemas are refined into ethical norms. Each component of the process is different, but they cooperate to construct an ethical approach to thinking. Hume’s guillotine mistakenly breaks down primary ethical schemas and juxtaposes emotions and cognitions. There is no ethics without coordinated emotional, cognitive and social analysis. Therefore, his theory can be seen as a pseudo problem. In the future, ethical processes will involve intelligent systems that can make ethical choices. Weak ethical artificial intelligence (AI) systems can apply given ethical rules to data, while strong ethical AI systems can derive their own rules from data and knowledge about human emotions. Resolving Hume’s guillotine introduces new ways to develop stronger forms of ethical AI. ...
Parent publication ISBN978-3-030-50266-9
ConferenceInternational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction
Is part of publicationCulture and Computing. 8th International Conference, C&C 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
Related funder(s)Academy of Finland
Funding program(s)Strategic research programmes, AoF
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Saariluoma, Pertti (Springer, 2020)Intelligent machines can follow ethical rules in their behaviour. However, it is less clear whether intelligent systems can also create new ethical principles. The former position can be called weak ethical AI and the ...
Vakkuri, Ville; Kemell, Kai-Kristian; Abrahamsson, Pekka (IEEE, 2020)Various recent Artificial Intelligence (AI) system failures, some of which have made the global headlines, have highlighted issues in these systems. These failures have resulted in calls for more ethical AI systems that ...
Vakkuri, Ville; Kemell, Kai-Kristian; Jantunen, Marianna; Halme, Erika; Abrahamsson, Pekka (Elsevier, 2021)Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems are becoming increasingly widespread and exert a growing influence on society at large. The growing impact of these systems has also highlighted potential issues that may arise from ...
Silvennoinen, Johanna Maria; Saariluoma, Pertti (University of Tehran, 2021)Current technology design pursues applying human-like features to AI technologies. These attempts have faced many challenges due to the essential complexities of the human mind. Cognitive mimetics is a design approach to ...
Silvennoinen, Johanna; Saariluoma, Pertti (AHFE international, 2022)Current and future AI design needs to recognize the intertwined nature of cognition and affect to design more human-like intelligent systems. The majority of current AI design focuses on cognitive information processes and ...