Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorChan, Derwin King Chung
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Lei
dc.contributor.authorLee, Alfred Sing Yeung
dc.contributor.authorHagger, Martin S.
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-17T07:31:24Z
dc.date.available2020-03-17T07:31:24Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationChan, D. K. C., Zhang, L., Lee, A. S. Y., & Hagger, M. S. (2020). Reciprocal relations between autonomous motivation from self-determination theory and social cognition constructs from the theory of planned behavior : a cross-lagged panel design in sport injury prevention. <i>Psychology of Sport and Exercise</i>, <i>48</i>, Article 101660. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101660</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_34463739
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/68206
dc.description.abstractObjectives The present study examined reciprocal relations between autonomous motivation from self-determination theory (SDT) and constructs from the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in a sport injury context. Methods The study adopted a three-wave longitudinal cross-lagged panel design. Physical education students in China (N = 4414; Mage = 14.42, SD = 1.75) completed self-report measures of autonomous motivation, attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control with respect to sport injury prevention at baseline (T1) and at two follow-up occasions one (T2) and three (T3) months later. Proposed reciprocal relations between autonomous motivation and the TPB constructs controlling for construct stability over time were tested using structural equation modeling. Results Three cross-lagged SEMs for effects of constructs measured at T1 on constructs measured at T2 and T3, and effects of constructs measured at T2 on constructs measured at T3 met goodness-of-fit criteria (CFI > 0.95, TLI > 0.94, RMSEA = 0.03, SRMR = 0.05) with consistent patterns of effects. Across the three models, autonomous motivation predicted the prospectively-measured TPB constructs with small-to-medium effect sizes (β range = 0.17 to 0.32, ps < .001), but associations between the TPB variables and prospectively-measured autonomous motivation were markedly smaller in size (β range = 0.01 to 0.18, ps range = .001 to .892). Conclusions Findings provide initial support for the temporal ordering of the constructs in the integrated model of SDT and TPB in a sport injury context. Autonomous motivation from SDT is likely to be an antecedent of the constructs from the TPB.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPsychology of Sport and Exercise
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherreciprocal model
dc.subject.othersport injury prevention
dc.subject.otherbehavior change model
dc.subject.othertheoretical integration
dc.subject.otherself-efficacy
dc.subject.otherself-determined motivation
dc.titleReciprocal relations between autonomous motivation from self-determination theory and social cognition constructs from the theory of planned behavior : a cross-lagged panel design in sport injury prevention
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202003172430
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineLiikuntapsykologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineSport and Exercise Psychologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1469-0292
dc.relation.volume48
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2020 Published by Elsevier Ltd
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysourheiluvammat
dc.subject.ysoehkäisy
dc.subject.ysomotivaatio
dc.subject.ysoterveyskäyttäytyminen
dc.subject.ysoitsemäärääminen
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12766
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p793
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4734
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11100
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9164
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101660
jyx.fundinginformationThis project is funded by Hong Kong Research Grant Council [27106016] awarded to Derwin Chan. Martin Hagger’s contribution was supported by a Finland Distinguished Professor (FiDiPro) award #1801/31/2105 from Business Finland.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0