Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNyberg, Crister
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T10:26:40Z
dc.date.available2019-07-03T10:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationNyberg, C. (2019). Philosophical investigations on integrative complexity. <i>European Journal of Social Sciences Studies</i>, <i>4</i>(3), 114-130. <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3242796" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3242796</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_31290367
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/64973
dc.description.abstractIntegrative complexity (IC) refers to a psychological construct, a measurement, and an experience. As a construct IC refers to our less than conscious thinking style in the face of difference or disagreement, how we process information, make decisions, solve problems. The cross-culturally validated empirical measurement frame of IC has predictive values. ’Low IC’ indicates a simple thinking style that is rigid and closed, a ’tunnel vision’ way of thinking that cannot respect or recognize different dimensions or perspectives on a topic, predicting destructive conflict or violence. An increasingly complex thinking style is able to ’see the big picture’, to differentiate and then integrate different dimensions and perspective on topics, linking them in some way, predicting more peaceful outcomes to conflict. As an experience, IC refers to less or more awareness of thoughts, emotion, and physical states in self and others related to IC management. The IC Thinking Research Group (University of Cambridge) pioneered the ’operationalization’ of the IC measure into an educational method, program and professional practices. The coding system i.e. empirical measurement frame, has been developed further to take elaborative aspects into account. The two components of complex thinking, differentiation and integration can each be broken down in two sub-components, elaborative and dialectical. In order to clarify the pros and cons of integrative complexity theory and its further developments in IC Thinking, it is useful to investigate its philosophical background. The theory and its applications are essentially dealing with language and the skill to use words or concepts. However it should be noted that besides the skills an essential part of the theory and its applications deals with our unconscious processes that are not explicitly controllable. An alternative for a philosophy of language behind the theory of integrative complexity is to consider an application of the use theory of meaning to explain its central components. Minimalist theory of fiction (MTF) was developed to explain the philosophical problems of fiction, but can also be applied to integrative complexity. Using words in different situations requires an ability to read contextual cues in order to follow the correct rules for the uses of words in particular contexts[1]. From these philosophical grounds, the theory of integrative complexity (IC) appears as a totality of the language games people are playing. One may be limited to one game, which means separating oneself from others, considering this game to be ultimately defining the correct uses of words. When one recognizes alternative games going on, it means reaching higher levels of IC. What is crucial is that this does not require a person to reject their core beliefs, since they may still be true. This approach challenges IC theory to improve its coding system but also offers possibilities for further developments and applications.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherOpen Access Publishing Group
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean Journal of Social Sciences Studies
dc.relation.urihttps://www.oapub.org/soc/index.php/EJSSS/article/view/558
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherajattelu
dc.subject.othermerkitykset
dc.subject.otherviestintä
dc.subject.otherkielifilosofia
dc.subject.otherWittgenstein, Ludwig
dc.subject.otherintegrative complexity
dc.subject.otheruse theory of meaning
dc.subject.otherLudwig Wittgenstein
dc.subject.othercommunication
dc.titlePhilosophical investigations on integrative complexity
dc.typearticle
dc.contributor.laitosHumanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Humanities and Social Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineFilosofiafi
dc.contributor.oppiainePhilosophyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange114-130
dc.relation.issn2501-8590
dc.relation.numberinseries3
dc.relation.volume4
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s), 2019.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.5281/zenodo.3242796


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0