Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKahilainen, Aapo
dc.contributor.authorPuurtinen, Mikael
dc.contributor.authorKotiaho, Janne Sakari
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-03T07:36:15Z
dc.date.available2019-05-03T07:36:15Z
dc.date.issued2014fi
dc.identifier.citationKahilainen, A., Puurtinen, M., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2014). Conservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlations. <em>Global Ecology and Conservation</em>, 2 (December ), 315-323. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.013">doi:10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.013</a>fi
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_63917
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63726
dc.description.abstractDespite its importance for the long-term viability of populations and functioning of ecosystems, the genetic diversity of populations is seldom given explicit consideration in conservation prioritization. Research on the species–genetic diversity correlation (SGDC) suggests that species diversity within a community and intrapopulation genetic diversity are positively correlated, due to the parallel influences of environmental characteristics (area, connectivity, and environmental heterogeneity) on both levels of diversity. A positive locality scale SGDC (i.e. -SGDC) thus provides potential for simultaneous conservation of both species diversity within a locality and intrapopulation genetic diversity. However, caution is needed, since in some situations environmental characteristics can influence species diversity and genetic diversity differently, resulting in a negative -SGDC. In such cases there can be a conflict between conservation of species diversity within localities and genetic diversity within populations. SGDCs provide useful information also for conservation planning, which considers compositional differences between localities, since the mechanisms behind -SGDCs can also drive correlations between differentiation of community and genetic compositions (i.e. -SGDCs). We suggest that emphasizing locality area and connectivity between similar localities in conservation planning best conserves both species and intrapopulation genetic diversity, and that focusing on highly complementary species richness may compromise conservation of genetic diversity.fi
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Ecology and Conservation
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherOpinionfi
dc.subject.otherReviewfi
dc.subject.otherSGDCfi
dc.subject.otherConservation planningfi
dc.subject.otherConservation prioritizationfi
dc.titleConservation implications of species–genetic diversity correlationsfi
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201904292315
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosTiedemuseofi
dc.contributor.laitosThe Department of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.laitosUniversity Museumen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologia
dc.contributor.oppiaineLuonnontieteellinen osasto
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2019-04-29T06:15:15Z
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange315 323
dc.relation.issn2351-9894
dc.relation.numberinseriesDecember
dc.relation.volume2
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2014 The Authors.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.gecco.2014.10.013


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY-NC-ND 4.0