Seal Exclusion Device in a pontoon trap for salmonids affects the size and numbers of caught fish
Calamnius, L. (2018). Seal Exclusion Device in a pontoon trap for salmonids affects the size and numbers of caught fish. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108196
Authors
Date
2018Copyright
© the Authors, 2018
Year
Test
Seal visits (no)
Frequency (visits per filmed hour)
Total time in trap or by SED (mm:ss)
2012
Diamond mesh SED
1
0.01
00:07
2012
Control
6
0.01
00:54
2016
Square mesh SED
1
0.01
05:13
2016
Diamond mesh SED
0
0.00
00:00
2016
Control
0
0.00
00:00
The pontoon trap is a successful means of mitigation in the conflict between coastal fishers and seals interacting with fishing gear. It distances caught fish from seals and is considered to be seal-safe in this respect [1]. The seals have had unlimited access to one of the final parts of the trap, the middle chamber. This leads to a risk of entanglement. In Finland the pontoon trap is considered to be the main cause of seals becoming bycatch [2]. Seals also damage and stress caught fish.
To prevent seals from entering the middle chamber two types of Seal Exclusion Devices (SEDs) were tested. The study used pontoon traps for salmon (Salmo salar) and brown trout (Salmo trutta). The SEDs were aluminium frames with Dyneema® yarn across the frame, in diamond or square mesh shapes. They were installed in the entrance of the middle chamber. The square mesh SED was rotated 45°. The control was an open frame. The hypothesis tested were (i) the SED would prevent seals from entering the middle chamber and (ii) the catch would increase. A negative side effect was expected. The SED would deter larger fish from entering. The collected data was the individual size of the fish and numbers of fish caught per soak day. Cameras were installed to record seal visits. The study was carried out over two years.
The visits of seals were too few to draw any inferences (Table 1). No seals were bycaught in any of the middle chambers.
Significantly larger salmons were caught in the trap with the square mesh SED, followed by the diamond mesh SED. It is likely that the SEDs had a retaining effect on larger salmons. For trout, significantly smaller fish were caught in the trap with the diamond mesh SED, suggesting that it was perceived as an obstacle. A possible explanation is that 44 % of the area in the diamond mesh SED was quarter or half mesh, thus creating a visual disturbance. In the square mesh SED all mesh were full and of the same size.
The numbers of caught salmon and trout were significantly greater in traps with a SED, i.e. profitable from a fishers point of view.
With the growing populations of seals in the Baltic it becomes increasingly more important to reduce the bycatch of seals, while not affecting the catch. A SED in a pontoon trap will also decrease stress on caught fish.
References
1. Hemmingsson M, Fjälling A, Lunneryd S-G. 2008 The pontoon trap: Description and function of a seal-safe trap-net. Fish. Res. 93, 357-359.
2. Vanhatalo J, Vetemaa M, Herrero A, Aho T, Tiilikainen R. 2014 By-catch of grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) in Baltic fisheries - A Bayesian analysis of interview survey. PLoS One 9, 1-17.
...
![showless](/themes/JYX2//images/showless.png)
![showmore](/themes/JYX2//images/showmore.png)
Publisher
Open Science Centre, University of JyväskyläConference
ECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland
Original source
https://peerageofscience.org/conference/eccb2018/108196/Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- ECCB 2018 [712]
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Replacement of fishmeal with corn gluten meal in feeds for juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) does not affect oxygen consumption during forced swimming
Siqingerile, Siqingerile; Pirhonen, Juhani (Elsevier, 2017)We compared oxygen consumption (MO2, mg/kg/h) of c. 80 g rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in an intermittent-flow swim respirometer at 15 °C. Before the tests the fish were grown in flow through tanks (15 °C) with either ... -
Safety in Numbers : How Color Morph Frequency Affects Predation Risk in an Aposematic Moth
Gordon, Swanne P.; Burdfield-Steel, Emily; Kirvesoja, Jimi; Mappes, Johanna (University of Chicago Press, 2021)Polymorphic warning signals in aposematic systems are enigmatic because predator learning should favor the most common form, creating positive frequency-dependent survival. However, many populations exhibit variation in ... -
Does Intraspecific Variation in rDNA Copy Number Affect Analysis of Microbial Communities?
Lavrinienko, Anton; Jernfors, Toni; Koskimäki, Janne J.; Pirttilä, Anna Maria; Watts, Phillip C. (Elsevier, 2021)Amplicon sequencing of partial regions of the ribosomal RNA loci (rDNA) is widely used to profile microbial communities. However, the rDNA is dynamic and can exhibit substantial interspecific and intraspecific variation ... -
Age is not just a number : Mathematical model suggests senescence affects how fish populations respond to different fishing regimes
Ahti, Pauliina A.; Uusi‐Heikkilä, Silva; Marjomäki, Timo J.; Kuparinen, Anna (John Wiley & Sons, 2021)Senescence is often described as an age-dependent increase in natural mortality (known as actuarial senescence) and an age-dependent decrease in fecundity (known as reproductive senescence), and its role in nature is still ... -
Directional selection, not the direction of selection, affects telomere length and copy number at ribosomal RNA loci
Sadler, Daniel E.; Watts, Phillip, C.; Uusi-Heikkilä, Silva (Springer, 2024)Many fisheries exert directional selection on traits such as body size and growth rate. Whether directional selection impacts regions of the genome associated with traits related to growth is unknown. To address this issue, ...