The GEO BON approach to globally coordinated biodiversity monitoring
Navarro, L., Fernández, N. and Pereira, H. (2018). The GEO BON approach to globally coordinated biodiversity monitoring. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108135
Date
2018Copyright
© the Authors, 2018
The agreement on the Aichi Biodiversity Targets by the Parties of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), the Sustainable Development Goals of the UN Agenda 2030, and the establishment of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) are encouraging responses to the biodiversity crisis. However, for these international efforts to be successful, our ability to assess biodiversity change must drastically improve. While emerging technologies (such as eDNA) and an increased use of citizen science improve the quantity of and access to biodiversity observations, monitoring efforts are still spatially and temporally fragmented, and taxonomically biased.
In this context, the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) was established in 2008 with the goal to improve the acquisition, coordination and delivery of biodiversity observations and related services to users including decision-makers and the scientific community [1]. This goal is achieved with the interconnection of two core components: the Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) framework [2], and a system of coordinated Biodiversity Observation Networks (BONs).
The EBVs can be understood as the level of integration between raw biodiversity observations obtained via in-situ monitoring or remote sensing in space and time, and biodiversity indicators. Those indicators are for instance used to track progress towards international and national targets for biodiversity, and within IPBES assessments.
The BONs, which can be thematic, national, or regional, produce, test and apply tools to deliver EBV-relevant data that can be upscaled and downscaled to support sustainable development and conservation decisions. In particular, regional and thematic BONs connect monitoring efforts across different dimensions and scales of biodiversity while National BONs, which correspond to the operational scale of many monitoring initiatives, are directly oriented to serve the needs of national and sub-national policy-makers.
Here, we will discuss the approach for a coordinated observing system adopted by GEO BON, and review challenges and advances in its implementation, by focusing on its two core components – the EBVs as a standard framework for biodiversity monitoring, and the Biodiversity Observation Networks that support harmonised observation systems - while highlighting their societal relevance.
References:
[1] Scholes RJ, Mace GM, Turner W, Geller GN, J\ürgens N, Larigauderie A, Muchoney D, Walther BA, Mooney HA: Toward a global biodiversity observing system. Science 2008, 321:1044–1045.
[2] Pereira HM, Ferrier S, Walters M, Geller GN, Jongman RHG, Scholes RJ, Bruford MW, Brummitt N, Butchart SHM, Cardoso AC, et al.: Essential Biodiversity Variables. Science 2013, 339:277–278.
...
Publisher
Open Science Centre, University of JyväskyläConference
ECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland
Original source
https://peerageofscience.org/conference/eccb2018/108135/Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- ECCB 2018 [712]
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Forest Fire Monitoring-An Integrated Approach to Sustain Forest Bio-diversity.
Lemmen, Christian (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Lack of appropriate forest spatial information has been a major challenge in Nepal. In the hilly and mountain regions of Nepal, forest fire is very common. Once there is a forest fire, there is loss of biodiversity including ... -
Approaches towards a European Monitoring of Biodiversity in Agricultural Landscapes
Oppermann, Rainer; Schraml, Antonia; Sutcliffe, Laura (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)The EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 aims to halt the loss of biodiversity and the degradation of ecosystem services in the European Union (EU). One major driver in the loss of biodiversity is the agricultural management ... -
How are we monitoring biodiversity? Indicators for evaluating and benchmarking species and habitat monitoring programmes in Europe
Szabolcs, Márton; Lengyel, Szabolcs; Kosztyi, Beatrix; Schmeller, Dirk; Henry, Pierre-Yves; Kotarac, Mladen; Lin, Yu-Pin; Henle, Klaus (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)The monitoring of species and habitats is essential to biodiversity conservation. Although guidelines for biodiversity monitoring have been published since at least 1920, we know little on current practices in existing ... -
The Austrian biodiversity monitoring “ÖBM Kulturlandschaft” and a unified biodiversity number for trend assessments
Schindler, Stefan; Zulka, Klaus Peter; Banko, Gebhard; Moser, Dietmar; Grillmayer, Roland; Rabitsch, Wolfgang; Essl, Franz; Paternoster, David; Staudinger, Markus; Zuna-Kratky, Thomas; Gallmetzer, Nina; Pascher, Kathrin; Stejskal-Tiefenbach, Maria (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)The Austrian biodiversity monitoring ÖBM-Kulturlandschaft has a focus on habitat and species diversity in Austrian cultural landscapes (including alpine pastures) and started in the year 2017. The stratified random selection ... -
Coordinate Globally, Serve Locally
Juego, Bonn (Tellus Institute, 2020)What would a desirable and viable global organization of progressive movements look like in the context of the historical conjuncture of crises-ridden capitalism? I propose here a reorientation of progressive politics that ...