Does EU matter for Conservation? The Birds and Habitats directives from a Nordic perspective
Widenfalk, L., Jonsson, B. G., Helldin, J. O., Öckinger, E. and Berggren, Å. (2018). Does EU matter for Conservation? The Birds and Habitats directives from a Nordic perspective. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/107977
© the Authors, 2018
The EU Birds and Habitats directives (and the associated Natura 2000 network) has recently been evaluated within the so called "Fitness Check" (EC 2016). This has resulted in a new Action Plan aiming to "rapidly improve practical implementation of the Nature Directives and accelerate progress towards the EU 2020 goal of halting and reversing the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services, including in relation to climate resilience and mitigation" (EC 2017). However, not all European Countries belong to the EU and conservation efforts has clearly been taken also in the countries not belonging to EU. During this workshop we aim to explore to what extent the EU system provides added value to efforts taken at national level in non-EU countries. By contrasting the Nordic nations, we may be able to identify which aspects that are supported by international initiatives. Among the Nordic nations, Finland, Sweden and Denmark are members while Norway and Iceland are not. Although ecological differences exist, the Nordic countries share many common aspects both concerning ecosystems, environmental policies and legislation. The workshop will open with short statements given by researchers, governmental representatives and legal expertise, and include a panel discussion to which the participants are invited to contribute. The workshop will highlight what is known today about the effects of EU legalisation on conservation work, but more importantly to identify gaps in our current knowledge and pointing at new research (and possible co-operation) needed. ...
PublisherOpen Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä
ConferenceECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland
MetadataShow full item record
- ECCB 2018 
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Aggregating protected habitats embraces implicit habitat conservation triage Kotiaho, Janne Sakari; Halme, Panu (Peerage of Science, 2014)
Space use data and systematic conservation planning inform habitat conservation priorities for brown bears in Romania Pop, Mihai; Iosif, Ruben; Miu, Viorica-Iulia; Rozylowicz, Laurentiu; Popescu, Viorel (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Recovery of large carnivores in the European human-dominated landscapes has sparked a debate regarding the optimal landscape conditions in which carnivores can thrive and coexist with humans (López-Bao et al. 2015). Here, ...
A matter of perspective : the cognitive style Field Independence - dependence, and why it matters Laine, Veera (2016)Psykologi Herman Witkin aloitti vuonna 1948 kognitiivista ajattelutapaa tutkivan suuntauksen, jossa ihmiset jaettiin kahteen ryhmään: kenttäriippuvaisiin ja kenttäriippumattomiin. Kenttäriippumattomuutta ja -riippuvaisuutta ...
How bright are the Nordic Lights? : job quality trends in Nordic countries in a comparative perspective Mustosmäki, Armi (University of Jyväskylä, 2017)Nordic countries stand out from the rest of the Europe in terms of job quality. Comparative research literature sought to explain the distinctiveness of Nordic countries with diverse sets of institutional frameworks. ...
Beyond the fragmentation debate in forest planning: how do habitat amount and spatial arrangement matter for saproxylic beetle diversity? Percel, Gwendoline; Laroche, Fabien; Bouget, Christophe (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)In managed forests, intensive silvicultural practices reduce the density/diversity of deadwood and tree microhabitats at the forest stand scale. This negatively affects biodiversity, especially saproxylic beetles which ...