dc.contributor.author | Lähdesmäki, Tuuli | |
dc.contributor.editor | Fenyvesi, Kristof | |
dc.contributor.editor | Lähdesmäki, Tuuli | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-10-01T06:19:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-01T22:35:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Lähdesmäki, T. (2017). Aesthetics of Geometry and the Problem of Representation in Monument Sculpture. In K. Fenyvesi, & T. Lähdesmäki (Eds.), <i>Aesthetics of Interdisciplinarity : Art and Mathematics</i> (pp. 275-290). Birkhäuser. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57259-8_17" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57259-8_17</a> | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-319-57257-4 | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_27779292 | |
dc.identifier.other | TUTKAID_76150 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/59718 | |
dc.description.abstract | Since the 1920s and 1930s, constructivist and concretist visual art movements have stressed
geometric forms, proportions and orders as a base for artistic expressions and aesthetic experiences.
After the World War II geometric form was adopted to the public sculpture. Abstract, geometrically
constructed sculpture was also used in commemorative functions in modern monument art. The
combination of the commemoration of a significant historical event or a national hero, and the
aesthetic ideas based on constructivist or concretist art movements caused a lot of debates and
confrontations in many Western countries. In particular, the interpretation of abstract monuments
problematized: abstract monuments were often interpreted (or tried to be interpreted) as metonymic
or metaphoric depictions or more or less symbolic images of the person or event for whom they
were erected. The idea of representation or the symbolic meanings, however, contradict the
principles of constructivist and concretist visual art movements. The article discusses two
contemporary constructivist and concretist monuments in Finland and illustrates how the problem
on representation has been solved in the public reception of them. | fi |
dc.format.extent | 290 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Birkhäuser | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Aesthetics of Interdisciplinarity : Art and Mathematics | |
dc.rights | In Copyright | |
dc.subject.other | taide | fi |
dc.subject.other | matematiikka | fi |
dc.subject.other | estetiikka | fi |
dc.subject.other | geometria | fi |
dc.subject.other | art | fi |
dc.subject.other | mathematics | fi |
dc.subject.other | aesthetics | fi |
dc.subject.other | geometry | fi |
dc.title | Aesthetics of Geometry and the Problem of Representation in Monument Sculpture | |
dc.type | bookPart | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201712184761 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Musiikin, taiteen ja kulttuurin tutkimuksen laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Music, Art and Culture Studies | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Taidehistoria | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Art History | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/BookItem | |
dc.date.updated | 2017-12-18T13:15:24Z | |
dc.relation.isbn | 978-3-319-57257-4 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 275-290 | |
dc.rights.copyright | © Springer International Publishing AG 2017 | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.subject.yso | taide | |
dc.subject.yso | matematiikka | |
dc.subject.yso | estetiikka | |
dc.subject.yso | geometria | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2851 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3160 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5196 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8708 | |
dc.rights.url | http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1007/978-3-319-57259-8_17 | |