Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.advisorAvela, Janne
dc.contributor.authorVirtanen, Minttu
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-25T10:15:02Z
dc.date.available2018-05-25T10:15:02Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/58114
dc.description.abstractAim: The aim of this study was to investigate if there are (1) differences between the effects of two taper models on strength performance, (2) changes in corticospinal excitability and inhibition as the effect of 8 week of strength training, and (3) changes in corticospinal excitability and inhibition following two different taper models. Methods: Two groups (n = 6 + 5) of recreationally active men first performed 8-week hypertrophic and maximum strength training period, and after that Group 1 performed two weeks of step taper and Group 2 two weeks of linear taper. Squat 1 RM, leg press MVIC, knee extension MVIC and the measurements of corticospinal excitability with transcranial magnetic stimulation were performed six time during the study: week before strength training (conrtol), before strength training, after 5 and 8 weeks of strength training and after one and two weeks of taper. Results: Squat 1 RM improved for both groups through the study whereas MVIC in leg press and knee extension did not change as clearly. There were not statistical differences between groups in any strength results. MEParea with different stimulation intensities, MEPsum and the slope of the I/O-curve remained constant or slightly decreased during the 8-week of strength training period, whereas during the first week of taper they slightly increased for group 1 and slightly decreased for group 2, and during the second week of taper vice versa. AMT and the duration of silent periods did not change significantly during the study. Discussion & conclusion: The results of this study suggest that there are not differences between the effects of step taper and linear taper on strength performance. During the 8-week hypertrophic and maximum strength training period corticospinal excitability remained con-stant or slightly decreased. During taper step taper corticospinal excitability first slightly increased and then slightly decreased whereas during linear taper appeared to happen vice versa.en
dc.format.extent73
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.subject.otherstrength training
dc.subject.otherstep taper
dc.subject.otherlinear taper
dc.subject.othercorticospinal excitability
dc.subject.othermotor evoked potential
dc.subject.othersilent period
dc.titleEffects of two different taper models after strength training on corticospinal excitability and muscle strength
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201805252784
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu -tutkielmafi
dc.type.ontasotMaster’s thesisen
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.laitosLiikunta- ja terveystieteetfi
dc.contributor.laitosSport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomekaniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineBiomechanicsen
dc.rights.copyrightJulkaisu on tekijänoikeussäännösten alainen. Teosta voi lukea ja tulostaa henkilökohtaista käyttöä varten. Käyttö kaupallisiin tarkoituksiin on kielletty.fi
dc.rights.copyrightThis publication is copyrighted. You may download, display and print it for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.en
dc.type.publicationmasterThesis
dc.contributor.oppiainekoodi5012
dc.subject.ysolihasvoima
dc.subject.ysotranskraniaalinen magneettistimulaatio
dc.subject.ysomuscle strength
dc.subject.ysotranscranial magnetic stimulation
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.type.okmG2


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot