Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training
Frazer, A., Howatson, G., Ahtiainen, J., Avela, J., Rantalainen, T., & Kidgell, D. (2019). Priming the Motor Cortex With Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Affects the Acute Inhibitory Corticospinal Responses to Strength Training. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 33(2), 307-317. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000002959
Published inJournal of Strength and Conditioning Research
DisciplineBiomekaniikkaValmennus- ja testausoppiBiomechanicsScience of Sport Coaching and Fitness Testing
© 2018 National Strength and Conditioning Association.
Synaptic plasticity in the motor cortex (M1) is associated with strength training (ST) and can be modified by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). The M1 responses to ST increase when anodal tDCS is applied during training due to gating. An additional approach to improve the M1 responses to ST, which has not been explored, is to use anodal tDCS to prime the M1 before a bout of ST. We examined the priming effects of anodal tDCS of M1 on the acute corticospinal responses to ST. In a randomized double-blinded cross-over design, changes in isometric strength, corticospinal excitability, and inhibition (assessed as area under the recruitment curve [AURC] using transcranial magnetic stimulation) were analyzed in 13 adults exposed to 20 minutes of anodal tDCS and sham tDCS followed by a ST session of the right elbow flexors. We observed a significant decrease in isometric elbow-flexor strength immediately after training (11–12%; p , 0.05), which was not different between anodal tDCS and sham tDCS. Transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed a 24% increase in AURC for corticospinal excitability after anodal tDCS and ST; this increase was not different between conditions. However, there was a 14% reduction in AURC for corticospinal inhibition when anodal tDCS was applied before ST when compared with sham tDCS and ST (all p , 0.05). Priming anodal tDCS had a limited effect in facilitating corticospinal excitability after an acute bout of ST. Interestingly, the interaction of anodal tDCS and ST seems to affect the excitability of intracortical inhibitory circuits of the M1 through nonhomeostatic mechanisms. ...
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins; National Strength and Conditioning Association
Publication in research information system
MetadataShow full item record
- Liikuntatieteiden tiedekunta 
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
Mason, Joel; Frazer, Ashlyn K.; Jaberzadeh, Shapour; Ahtiainen, Juha P.; Avela, Janne; Rantalainen, Timo; Leung, Michael; Kidgell, Dawson J. (Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019)Neuroplastic changes in the primary motor cortex accompany performance improvements following motor practice. Recent evidence suggests that the corticospinal responses to strength and skill training are similar, following ...
Mason, Joel; Frazer, Ashlyn K.; Avela, Janne; Pearce, Alan J.; Howatson, Glyn; Kidgell, Dawson J. (Springer, 2020)Purpose The motor cortex (M1) appears to be a primary site of adaptation following both a single session, and repeated strength-training sessions across multiple weeks. Given that a single session of strength-training is ...
Modulation of plasticity of the soleus area of the motor cortex using paired associative stimulation Kumpulainen, Susanne (University of Jyväskylä, 2015)Paired associative stimulation (PAS) repeatedly combines single somatosensory nerve stimuli with single transcranial magnetic stimuli to induce bidirectional changes in the excitability of the cortical projections to ...
Progression of adverse effects over consecutive sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation Kortteenniemi, Aaron; Javadi, Amir-Homayoun; Wikgren, Jan; Lehto, Soili M. (Elsevier, 2017)
Hautasaari, Pekka; McLellan, Susanna; Koskio, Maija; Pesonen, Heidi; Tarkka, Ina M. (Elsevier Ltd, 2020)Exercise affects positively on self-reported pain in musculoskeletal pain conditions possibly via top-down pain inhibitory networks. However, the role of cortical activity in these networks is unclear. The aim of the current ...