Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorStutz, Christian
dc.contributor.authorSachs, Sybille
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-11T06:14:34Z
dc.date.available2017-12-11T06:14:34Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationStutz, C., & Sachs, S. (2018). Facing the Normative Challenges : The Potential of Reflexive Historical Research. <i>Business and Society</i>, <i>57</i>(1), 98-130. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316681989" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650316681989</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_26493732
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_72692
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/56217
dc.description.abstractThis article explores methodological problems of qualitative research templates, that is, the Eisenhardt and the Gioia case study approaches, which are relevant for the business and society (B&S) scholarship and outlines a reflexive historical research methodology that has the potential to face these challenges. Building on Hans-Georg Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics, we draw critical attention to qualitative B&S research and frame the methodological problems identified as the normative challenges of qualitative research, that is, to productively deal with both the researchers’ norms and the research subjects’ norms. We then introduce the reflexive historical case study (RHCS), a distinct research strategy to face normative challenges based on philosophical hermeneutics and the interpretive tradition of studying organizations. This research approach aims at theory elaboration while its mode of enquiry is reflexive. By explicating three of its key characteristics and using a case example to illustrate our approach, we demonstrate how B&S scholars can benefit from the “temporal filter” of the historical lens and from reflexive concerns about the nature of theory and empirical material. To tap the potential of historical research, we finally envision a research program for studying issues and debates associated with B&S scholarship.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSage Publications
dc.relation.ispartofseriesBusiness and Society
dc.subject.othercorporate social responsibility
dc.subject.otherqualitative research methodologies
dc.subject.otherstakeholder theory
dc.subject.othertheory elaborating
dc.titleFacing the Normative Challenges : The Potential of Reflexive Historical Research
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201712084564
dc.contributor.laitosHistorian ja etnologian laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of History and Ethnologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineTaloushistoriafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEconomic Historyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2017-12-08T13:15:07Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange98-130
dc.relation.issn0007-6503
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume57
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2016. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by SAGE. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysohistoriantutkimus
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10414
dc.relation.doi10.1177/0007650316681989
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot