Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKujala, Tuomo
dc.contributor.authorGrahn, Hilkka
dc.contributor.editorBoll, Susanne
dc.contributor.editorPfleging, Bastian
dc.contributor.editorDonmez, Birsen
dc.contributor.editorPolitis, Ioannis
dc.contributor.editorLarge, David
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-13T09:48:57Z
dc.date.available2017-10-13T09:48:57Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationKujala, T., & Grahn, H. (2017). Visual distraction effects of in-car text entry methods : Comparing keyboard, handwriting and voice recognition. In S. Boll, B. Pfleging, B. Donmez, I. Politis, & D. Large (Eds.), <i>AutomotiveUI '17 : Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications</i> (pp. 1-10). ACM. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3122987" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3122987</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_27254005
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_75169
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/55620
dc.description.abstractThree text entry methods were compared in a driving simulator study with 17 participants. Ninety-seven drivers’ occlusion distance (OD) data mapped on the test routes was used as a baseline to evaluate the methods’ visual distraction potential. Only the voice recognition-based text entry tasks passed the set verification criteria. Handwriting tasks were experienced as the most demanding and the voice recognition tasks as the least demanding. An individual in-car glance length preference was found, but against expectations, drivers’ ODs did not correlate with incar glance lengths or visual short-term memory capacity. The handwriting method was further studied with 24 participants with instructions and practice on writing eyeson-road. The practice did not affect the test results. The findings suggest that handwriting could be visually less demanding than touch screen typing but the reliability of character recognition should be improved or the driver well-experienced with the method to minimize its distraction potential.
dc.format.extent317
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherACM
dc.relation.ispartofAutomotiveUI '17 : Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
dc.subject.otherdriver distraction
dc.subject.othervisual demand
dc.subject.othervisual occlusion
dc.subject.otherocclusion distance
dc.subject.othertext entry methods
dc.subject.othervisual short-term memory
dc.subject.otherVisual Patterns Test
dc.titleVisual distraction effects of in-car text entry methods : Comparing keyboard, handwriting and voice recognition
dc.typeconferenceObject
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201710103971
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineKognitiotiedefi
dc.contributor.oppiaineCognitive Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper
dc.date.updated2017-10-10T09:15:03Z
dc.relation.isbn978-1-4503-5150-8
dc.type.coarconference paper
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1-10
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2017 Association for Computing Machinery. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by ACM. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
dc.relation.doi10.1145/3122986.3122987


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record