dc.contributor.author | Kankaanpää, Irja | |
dc.contributor.author | Sivula, Henna | |
dc.contributor.author | Ahonen, Jarmo | |
dc.contributor.author | Tilus, Tero | |
dc.contributor.author | Koskinen, Jussi | |
dc.contributor.author | Juutilainen, Päivi | |
dc.contributor.editor | Remenyi, Dan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-24T09:05:42Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-24T09:05:42Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Kankaanpää, I., Sivula, H., Ahonen, J., Tilus, T., Koskinen, J., & Juutilainen, P. (2005). ISEBA – A Framework for IS Evolution Benefit Assessment. In D. Remenyi (Ed.), <i>Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation (ECITE 2005)</i> (pp. 255-264). Academic Conferences International. | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_15379700 | |
dc.identifier.other | TUTKAID_16892 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/54097 | |
dc.description.abstract | Decisions regarding information system evolution strategy, including modernization or replacement,
are economically significant. Selection of a proper method for analyzing potential options, acquisition of suitable
metrics or follow-up data, and evaluation of the results are major challenges in the evolution strategy decision
making. In order to address these challenges, a framework for Information System Evolution Benefit Assessment
(ISEBA) was developed. ISEBA provides assistance in the selection of a benefit-evaluation method for the
investment situation at hand. It is based on empirical research on industrial decision making and co-operation
projects, and examination of existing research results from information technology investment-evaluations. Based
on the experiences from real world industrial cases, it can be alleged that ISEBA suits its purpose. It makes a
decision maker take note of relevant issues in evolution investment decision making, leads to the selection of
suitable appraisal method, and promotes discussion of the value of the results. Among the results of the industrial
cases, the following was found. Firstly, resources are an important factor influencing the selection of an
investment assessment method. Secondly, the appearance of both tangible and intangible benefits is scattered
with respect to time and organizational structure. Thirdly, a dichotomy exists between upper management
decisions and lower level organizational goals. The benefit appraisal was focused on an operative level while real
project objectives were set on a strategic level. It is concluded, that a need for a practical framework, such as
ISEBA, exists. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Academic Conferences International | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation (ECITE 2005) | |
dc.subject.other | tietojärjestelmien evoluutiostrategiat | |
dc.subject.other | hyötyjen arviointi | |
dc.subject.other | investointivaihtoehtojen arviointi | |
dc.subject.other | IS evolution strategy | |
dc.subject.other | benefit assessment | |
dc.subject.other | industrial decision making | |
dc.subject.other | investment options evaluation | |
dc.title | ISEBA – A Framework for IS Evolution Benefit Assessment | |
dc.type | conferenceObject | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201605262720 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Informaatioteknologian tiedekunta | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Faculty of Information Technology | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaper | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-05-26T09:15:03Z | |
dc.relation.isbn | 1-905305-09-5(b) | |
dc.type.coar | conference paper | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 255-264 | |
dc.type.version | acceptedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © the Authors & Academic Conferences International, 2005. | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.subject.yso | päätöksenteko | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8743 | |