Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTriviño, María
dc.contributor.authorJuutinen, Artti
dc.contributor.authorMazziotta, Adriano
dc.contributor.authorMiettinen, Kaisa
dc.contributor.authorPodkopaev, Dmitry
dc.contributor.authorReunanen, Pasi
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-24T10:58:56Z
dc.date.available2017-03-12T22:45:09Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationTriviño, M., Juutinen, A., Mazziotta, A., Miettinen, K., Podkopaev, D., Reunanen, P., & Mönkkönen, M. (2015). Managing a boreal forest landscape for providing timber, storing and sequestering carbon. <em>Ecosystem Services</em>, 14 (August), 179-189. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.003">doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.003</a>
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_65682
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/51672
dc.description.abstractHuman well-being highly depends on ecosystem services and this dependence is expected to increase in the future with increasing population and economic growth. Studies that investigate trade-offs between ecosystem services are urgently needed for informing policy-makers. We examine the trade-offs between a provisioning (revenues from timber selling) and regulating (carbon storage and sequestration) ecosystem services among seven alternative forest management regimes in a large boreal forest production landscape. First, we estimate the potential of the landscape to produce harvest revenues and store/sequester carbon across a 50-year time period. Then, we identify conflicts between harvest revenues and carbon storage and sequestration. Finally, we apply multiobjective optimization to find optimal combinations of forest management regimes that maximize harvest revenues and carbon storage/sequestration. Our results show that no management regime alone is able to either maximize harvest revenues or carbon services and that a combination of different regimes is needed. We also show that with a relatively little economic investment (5% decrease in harvest revenues), a substantial increase in carbon services could be attained (9% for carbon storage; 15–23% for carbon sequestration). We conclude that it is possible to achieve win–win situations applying diversified forest management planning at a landscape level.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcosystem Services
dc.subject.othercarbon storage and sequestration
dc.subject.otherclimate change
dc.subject.otherecosystem service trade-offs
dc.subject.otherFinland
dc.subject.otherforest management
dc.subject.othermultiobjective optimization
dc.titleManaging a boreal forest landscape for providing timber, storing and sequestering carbon
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201610244421
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosTietotekniikan laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosThe Department of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Mathematical Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologia
dc.contributor.oppiaineTietotekniikka
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2016-10-24T09:15:12Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange179-189
dc.relation.issn2212-0416
dc.relation.volume14
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2015 Elsevier B.V. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Elsevier. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.02.003


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record