dc.contributor.author | Rachele, Jerome N. | |
dc.contributor.author | Jaakkola, Timo | |
dc.contributor.author | Washington, Tracy L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Cuddihy, Thomas F. | |
dc.contributor.author | McPhail, Steven M. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-07-13T07:06:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-07-13T07:06:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Rachele, J. N., Jaakkola, T., Washington, T. L., Cuddihy, T. F., & McPhail, S. M. (2015). Adolescent Self-Reported Physical Activity and Autonomy : A Case for Constrained and Structured Environments?. <i>Journal of Sports Science and Medicine</i>, <i>14</i>(3), 568-573. | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_25330980 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/50812 | |
dc.description.abstract | The provision of autonomy supportive environments that promote
physical activity engagement have become popular in
contemporary youth settings. However, questions remain about
whether adolescent perceptions of their autonomy have implications
for physical activity. The purpose of this investigation was
to examine the association between adolescents’ self-reported
physical activity and their perceived autonomy. Participants (n =
384 adolescents) aged between 12 and 15 years were recruited
from six secondary schools in metropolitan Brisbane, Australia.
Self-reported measures of physical activity and autonomy were
obtained. Logistic regression with inverse probability weights
were used to examine the association between autonomy and the
odds of meeting youth physical activity guidelines. Autonomy
(OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.76) and gender (OR 0.62, 95% CI
0.46-0.83) were negatively associated with meeting physical
activity guidelines. However, the model explained only a small
amount of the variation in whether youth in this sample met
physical activity guidelines (R2 = 0.023). For every 1 unit decrease
in autonomy (on an index from 1 to 5), participants were
1.64 times more likely to meet physical activity guidelines. The
findings, which are at odds with several previous studies, suggest
that interventions designed to facilitate youth physical
activity should limit opportunities for youth to make independent
decisions about their engagement. However, the small
amount of variation explained by the predictors in the model is a
caveat, and should be considered prior to applying such suggestions
in practical settings. Future research should continue to
examine a larger age range, longitudinal observational or intervention
studies to examine assertions of causality, as well as
objective measurement of physical activity. | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Journal of Sports Science and Medicine | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Journal of Sports Science and Medicine | |
dc.subject.other | Adolescent | |
dc.subject.other | autonomy | |
dc.subject.other | physical activity | |
dc.subject.other | self-determination theory | |
dc.subject.other | self-report | |
dc.title | Adolescent Self-Reported Physical Activity and Autonomy : A Case for Constrained and Structured Environments? | |
dc.type | research article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201607083536 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Liikuntakasvatuksen laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Sport Sciences | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Liikuntapedagogiikka | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Sport Pedagogy | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.date.updated | 2016-07-08T06:15:12Z | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 568-573 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1303-2968 | |
dc.relation.numberinseries | 3 | |
dc.relation.volume | 14 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © the Authors & Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 2015. This is an open access article published by Journal of Sports Science and Medicine. | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.type.publication | article | |
dc.type.okm | A1 | |