Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMeriläinen, Niina
dc.contributor.authorVos, Marita
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-26T11:34:58Z
dc.date.available2015-02-26T11:34:58Z
dc.date.issued2015fi
dc.identifier.citationMeriläinen, N., & Vos, M. (2015). Public Discourse on Human Trafficking in International Issue Arenas. <em>Societies</em>, 5 (1), 14-42. <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/soc5010014">doi:10.3390/soc5010014</a> Retrieved from <a href="http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/1/14/htm">http://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/1/14/htm</a>fi
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_65403
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/45409
dc.description.abstractAbstract. The purpose of this study is to better understand how the complex problem of human trafficking is addressed in international debates. How the discussion about human trafficking develops and how it is debated ultimately influences how the decision-making process unfolds. In order to understand the formation of public policy and laws, therefore, it is important to study the debate that occurs prior to decision making. This analysis focuses on the narratives used by major, well-established human rights and political actors that argue for necessary actions to be undertaken — such as the formation of new policies and laws in the European Union — as an attempt to protect citizens of the EU and other regions in the world from becoming victims of trafficking networks. Our research examines how the topic of human trafficking is framed and how this framework is intertwined in the debate with other social problems. We focus on how human trafficking is discussed by two well-established human rights Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs), Amnesty International (Amnesty) and Human Rights Watch (HRW), in addition to the European Parliament (EP). The research questions for this study include: (1) In what context is human trafficking discussed by the three actors? (2) How do these actors frame the definition of human trafficking in their presentations? To answer these questions, we have conducted a systematic content analysis of documents that include official statements and research reports of the NGOs, as well as resolutions and recommendations of the EP. Altogether, 240 documents were analyzed in detail. These findings indicate that the two human rights organizations, Amnesty and Human Rights Watch, along with the European Parliament, all address human trafficking as an important social problem, albeit to varying degrees. Each actor has a different method of correlating human trafficking with many other social problems, thereby emphasizing different causes and effects. In our analysis, we examine the concept of framing and, in particular, responsibility framing in order to understand the causal relationships between actors and events. The findings of this study suggest that the formation of various social policies and laws in the international political forum are deeply affected by the dynamic interrelatedness between the political issues, actors, and form and content of the debates about human trafficking that precede the formation or revision of a policy and law.fi
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherM D P I AG
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSocieties
dc.relation.urihttp://www.mdpi.com/2075-4698/5/1/14/htm
dc.subject.otherhuman traffickingfi
dc.subject.otherhuman rightsfi
dc.subject.othercommunicationfi
dc.subject.otherissue arenasfi
dc.titlePublic Discourse on Human Trafficking in International Issue Arenasfi
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201502251377
dc.contributor.laitosViestintätieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Communicationen
dc.contributor.oppiaineYhteisöviestintä
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/SubmittedJournalArticle
dc.date.updated2015-02-25T16:30:18Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange14-42
dc.relation.issn2075-4698
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume5
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2015 by MDPI (http://www.mdpi.org). Reproduction is permitted for noncommercial purposes. Further distribution has been made available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0. (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.rights.urlhttp://www.mdpi.com/about/openaccess
dc.relation.doi10.3390/soc5010014


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record