dc.contributor.author | Fenyvesi, Kristof | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-02-18T11:42:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-02-18T11:42:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Fenyvesi, K. (2014). Dionysian biopolitics : Karl Kerényi's concept of indestructible life. <i>Comparative philosophy</i>, <i>5</i>(2), 45-68. <a href="https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2014).050208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2014).050208</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_23811085 | |
dc.identifier.other | TUTKAID_62646 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/45356 | |
dc.description.abstract | Scholar of religion Karl Kerényi’s last book, Dionysos, is a grand attempt at
reinterpreting ζωη (zoe), the Greek concept of indestructible life, which he distinguishes from
βίος (bios), finite life. In Kerényi’s view, the meaning and sensual experience of zoe was
expressed in its richest form in the Cretan beginnings of the cult of Dionysos. The major
characteristics of this cult, as Kerényi describes, were beyond the cultural, political, and
sexual limits of the Christian interpretations of life and nature. Searching for modern
analogies to zoe, Kerényi explains the idea in relation to molecular biology’s minimum
definition of life. Despite the fact that Kerényi’s book contains only minor references to
contemporary philosophy, the philosophical consequences of his interpretations of Dionysos
are not only radical but outline a notion of biopolitics far in advance of the mid- to late 20thcentury
development of it. By the affirmation of indestructible life and animality, Kerényi
proposes a new humanism that moves beyond the limits of Kantian anthropology and also
takes a radically different perspective to that of Heidegger’s philosophy of being, or
Agamben’s notion of biopolitics. According to Kerényi’s investigations, since this alternative
humanism, which is based on the radical recognition of the individuality and diversity of life
forms, was once possible in an earlier stage of human culture, it is possible to reanimate it in
order to shape anew how zoe is understood and therefore lived. Our relation to nature can
thereby undergo a Dionysian transvaluation and assign us new responsibilities as well as
open up a new trajectory for the 21st-century human. | fi |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | San José State University | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Comparative philosophy | |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.comparativephilosophy.org/index.php/ComparativePhilosophy/article/view/263 | |
dc.subject.other | Karl Kerényi | |
dc.subject.other | religion | |
dc.subject.other | zoe | |
dc.subject.other | bios | |
dc.subject.other | Agamben | |
dc.title | Dionysian biopolitics : Karl Kerényi's concept of indestructible life | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201409042712 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Musiikin, taiteen ja kulttuurin tutkimuksen laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Music, Art and Culture Studies | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Nykykulttuurin tutkimus | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Contemporary Culture | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | School of Wellbeing | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.date.updated | 2014-09-04T03:30:08Z | |
dc.type.coar | journal article | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 45-68 | |
dc.relation.issn | 2151-6014 | |
dc.relation.numberinseries | 2 | |
dc.relation.volume | 5 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © Fenyvesi & San José State University, 2014. | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.subject.yso | luonto | |
dc.subject.yso | biopolitiikka | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13084 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23208 | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.31979/2151-6014(2014).050208 | |