Dionysian biopolitics : Karl Kerényi's concept of indestructible life
Fenyvesi, K. (2014). Dionysian biopolitics : Karl Kerényi's concept of indestructible life. Comparative philosophy, 5(2), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.31979/2151-6014(2014).050208
Published in
Comparative philosophyAuthors
Date
2014Copyright
© Fenyvesi & San José State University, 2014.
Scholar of religion Karl Kerényi’s last book, Dionysos, is a grand attempt at
reinterpreting ζωη (zoe), the Greek concept of indestructible life, which he distinguishes from
βίος (bios), finite life. In Kerényi’s view, the meaning and sensual experience of zoe was
expressed in its richest form in the Cretan beginnings of the cult of Dionysos. The major
characteristics of this cult, as Kerényi describes, were beyond the cultural, political, and
sexual limits of the Christian interpretations of life and nature. Searching for modern
analogies to zoe, Kerényi explains the idea in relation to molecular biology’s minimum
definition of life. Despite the fact that Kerényi’s book contains only minor references to
contemporary philosophy, the philosophical consequences of his interpretations of Dionysos
are not only radical but outline a notion of biopolitics far in advance of the mid- to late 20thcentury
development of it. By the affirmation of indestructible life and animality, Kerényi
proposes a new humanism that moves beyond the limits of Kantian anthropology and also
takes a radically different perspective to that of Heidegger’s philosophy of being, or
Agamben’s notion of biopolitics. According to Kerényi’s investigations, since this alternative
humanism, which is based on the radical recognition of the individuality and diversity of life
forms, was once possible in an earlier stage of human culture, it is possible to reanimate it in
order to shape anew how zoe is understood and therefore lived. Our relation to nature can
thereby undergo a Dionysian transvaluation and assign us new responsibilities as well as
open up a new trajectory for the 21st-century human.
...


Publisher
San José State UniversityISSN Search the Publication Forum
2151-6014Keywords
Original source
http://www.comparativephilosophy.org/index.php/ComparativePhilosophy/article/view/263Publication in research information system
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/23811085
Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Plato and the Biopolitical Purge of the City-State
Ojakangas, Mika (Oxford University Press, 2022)This chapter argues that Plato’s mature political philosophy is essentially biopolitical, representing, in particular, what Foucault identifies as biopolitical state racism. A state racist mentality looks at the population ... -
When did biopolitics begin? : Actuality and potentiality in historical events
Prozorov, Sergei (SAGE Publications, 2022)The article addresses the ongoing debate about the origins of biopolitics. While Foucault’s analysis of biopolitics approached it as a modern rationality of government, Agamben’s Homo Sacer series presented biopolitics as ... -
Sosiaalisen nousu ja paljas elämä : Arendt suhteessa Foucault'n ja Agambenin edustamaan biopolitiikan teoriaperinteeseen
Lindholm, Samuel (2016)Tutkielman tarkoituksena on vertailla Hannah Arendtin poliittista ajattelua biopolitiikan kahden keskeisen teoreetikon Michel Foucault’n ja Giorgio Agambenin ajatteluun. Arendt analysoi sosiaalisen nousua, jonka yhteydessä ... -
Bene vivere politice : On the (Meta)biopolitics of “Happiness”
Backman, Jussi (Oxford University Press, 2022)This chapter approaches the question of biopolitics in ancient political thought looking not at specific political techniques but at notions of the final aim of the political community. It argues that the “happiness” ... -
From Biopolitics to Biopoetics and Back Again : On a Counterintuitive Continuity in Foucault’s Thought
Prozorov, Sergei (Oxford University Press, 2022)The chapter addresses the relation between Michel Foucault’s studies of biopolitics and his work on the ancient techniques of the self in the 1980s. It argues that Foucault’s distinction between biopoetics and biopolitics ...