Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorOldén, Anna
dc.contributor.authorOvaskainen, Otso
dc.contributor.authorKotiaho, Janne Sakari
dc.contributor.authorLaaka-Lindberg, Sanna
dc.contributor.authorHalme, Panu
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-17T08:28:13Z
dc.date.available2014-06-17T08:28:13Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationOldén, A., Ovaskainen, O., Kotiaho, J. S., Laaka-Lindberg, S., & Halme, P. (2014). Bryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not. <i>PLOS ONE</i>, <i>9</i>(4), Article e93786. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093786" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0093786</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_23597892
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/43739
dc.description.abstractGreen-tree retention is a forest management method in which some living trees are left on a logged area. The aim is to offer ‘lifeboats’ to support species immediately after logging and to provide microhabitats during and after forest re-establishment. Several studies have shown immediate decline in bryophyte diversity after retention logging and thus questioned the effectiveness of this method, but longer term studies are lacking. Here we studied the epiphytic bryophytes on European aspen (Populus tremula L.) retention trees along a 30-year chronosequence. We compared the bryophyte flora of 102 ‘retention aspens’ on 14 differently aged retention sites with 102 ‘conservation aspens’ on 14 differently aged conservation sites. We used a Bayesian community-level modelling approach to estimate the changes in bryophyte species richness, abundance (area covered) and community structure during 30 years after logging. Using the fitted model, we estimated that two years after logging both species richness and abundance of bryophytes declined, but during the following 20–30 years both recovered to the level of conservation aspens. However, logging-induced changes in bryophyte community structure did not fully recover over the same time period. Liverwort species showed some or low potential to benefit from lifeboating and high potential to re-colonise as time since logging increases. Most moss species responded similarly, but two cushion-forming mosses benefited from the logging disturbance while several weft- or mat-forming mosses declined and did not re-colonise in 20–30 years. We conclude that retention trees do not function as equally effective lifeboats for all bryophyte species but are successful in providing suitable habitats for many species in the long-term. To be most effective, retention cuts should be located adjacent to conservation sites, which may function as sources of re-colonisation and support the populations of species that require old-growth forests.fi
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLOS ONE
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherhakkuualueet
dc.subject.othergreen tree retention
dc.subject.otherforest reestablishment
dc.subject.otherbryophyte diversity
dc.titleBryophyte Species Richness on Retention Aspens Recovers in Time but Community Structure Does Not
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201405101674
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosTiedemuseofi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.laitosUniversity Museumen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineMuseofi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineMuseumen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2014-05-10T03:30:16Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn1932-6203
dc.relation.numberinseries4
dc.relation.volume9
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2014 Oldén et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.subject.ysometsänhoito
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysoelvytys
dc.subject.ysosammalet
dc.subject.ysometsänkäsittely
dc.subject.ysolehtisammalet
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7534
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p10110
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12566
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27050
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p8411
dc.rights.urlhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0093786
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0