Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPeura, Maiju
dc.contributor.authorEyvindson, Kyle
dc.contributor.authorBurgas, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorMönkkönen, Mikko
dc.contributor.authorRaatikainen, Kaisa J.
dc.contributor.authorKotiaho, Janne S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-01T09:24:11Z
dc.date.available2024-03-01T09:24:11Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationPeura, M., Eyvindson, K., Burgas, D., Mönkkönen, M., Raatikainen, K. J., & Kotiaho, J. S. (2024). Cost-effective biodiversity protection through multiuse-conservation landscapes. <i>Landscape Ecology</i>, <i>39</i>(3), Article 48. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01803-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-024-01803-5</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_207319364
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/93774
dc.description.abstractContext Intensive land use and exploitation of natural resources are the main direct drivers of biodiversity loss. Transformative changes in land management are called for as conservation and management actions have not been sufficient to support the viability of species populations. It has been proposed that to solve the sufficiency problem one could segregate the landscape into an intensively managed part, and into so-called multiuse-conservation landscapes that aggregate set asides with managed areas for multiple uses. Objectives We describe a scenario analysis where we evaluate the effects and cost-efficiency of transforming the boreal forest from intensively managed production landscapes progressively towards multiuse-conservation landscapes. Methods We simulated Finnish boreal forests under various managements and optimized management to produce six scenarios to reveal the ecological, economic, climate and management regime implications of multiuse-conservation landscapes. Ecological effects explored included habitat availability and metacommunity capacity of dead wood dependent species. Results Increasing the area of set aside and multiuse management increased the habitat availability and metacommunity capacity as well as climate benefits but caused economic losses in terms of timber revenues. Pooling the set asides and multiuse management areas together into the same landscapes reduced the economic losses, had negligible added climate benefits and produced mixed biodiversity effects: pooling decreased habitat availability but increased metacommunity capacity across all landscapes. Conclusions Changing land management and aggregating conservation efforts can be a cost-efficient way to protect biodiversity. Our results suggest biodiversity benefits in landscapes where the set aside and multiuse is aggregated. Careful spatial planning can also alleviate the conflicts between ecological and economic values of land.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC
dc.relation.ispartofseriesLandscape Ecology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity loss
dc.subject.otherconnectivity
dc.subject.otherforestry
dc.subject.otherland sharing
dc.subject.otherland sparing
dc.subject.otherpopulation ecology
dc.subject.otherspatial planning
dc.titleCost-effective biodiversity protection through multiuse-conservation landscapes
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202403012244
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0921-2973
dc.relation.numberinseries3
dc.relation.volume39
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Author(s) 2024
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysosimulointi
dc.subject.ysomaankäyttö
dc.subject.ysokustannustehokkuus
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysomonikäyttö
dc.subject.ysooptimointi
dc.subject.ysoluonnonsuojelu
dc.subject.ysomaankäytön suunnittelu
dc.subject.ysomaisemaekologia
dc.subject.ysopopulaatioekologia
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4787
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6713
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20596
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11970
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p13477
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6755
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24317
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20115
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10980-024-01803-5
jyx.fundinginformationOpen Access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU). This work was supported by Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation and Olvi Foundation (personal Grants for Maiju Peura).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0