Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorMikkonen, Ninni
dc.contributor.authorLeikola, Niko
dc.contributor.authorLehtomäki, Joona
dc.contributor.authorHalme, Panu
dc.contributor.authorMoilanen, Atte
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-09T08:42:50Z
dc.date.available2023-06-09T08:42:50Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationMikkonen, N., Leikola, N., Lehtomäki, J., Halme, P., & Moilanen, A. (2023). National high-resolution conservation prioritisation of boreal forests. <i>Forest Ecology and Management</i>, <i>541</i>, Article 121079. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121079</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_183517476
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/87609
dc.description.abstractThe continuous decline of forest biodiversity highlights the importance of the development of cost-effective and ecologically sustainable land-use planning approaches. Spatial conservation prioritisation (SCP) can be regarded as a useful tool for this challenge. We produced high-resolution, national scale SCP analyses to identify unprotected forest areas that host valuable forest biodiversity. We used stand-based modelled dead wood potential (DWP) data as a primary surrogate for conservation value. In addition, data on forestry operations that have negative impacts on biodiversity, connectivity between forest areas, the observations of red-listed forest species, connectivity to forest habitats of special importance for biodiversity, and connectivity to permanent protected areas were included in the analyses. Analyses addressed the estimation of present value and that of future potential following increases in connectivity. The results show that there are high conservation priority forest areas all over Finland although their distribution is highly fragmented. Depending on the version of the analyses, the best 10% of the landscape contains from 49% to 88% of the conservation values, a significant portion of which lie outside the current protected area network. Consequently, as biodiversity continues to decline in Finland and as most of the Finnish forest area is under commercial management, the current protected area network cannot be expected to halt the ongoing decline of forest biodiversity. Therefore, these analyses provide much-needed information for decision-making. They are a pragmatic tool for the planning of forest conservation networks and commercial management of forests at regional and national scales.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier BV
dc.relation.ispartofseriesForest Ecology and Management
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherbiodiversity
dc.subject.otherconnectivity
dc.subject.otherconservation planning
dc.subject.otherdead wood
dc.subject.otherecological decision-making
dc.subject.otherforest biodiversity
dc.subject.otherland use planning
dc.subject.otherzonation software
dc.titleNational high-resolution conservation prioritisation of boreal forests
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202306093678
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEvoluutiotutkimus (huippuyksikkö)fi
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineCentre of Excellence in Evolutionary Researchen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0378-1127
dc.relation.volume541
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2023 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysoboreaalinen vyöhyke
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysoluonnonsuojelu
dc.subject.ysometsät
dc.subject.ysoluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.subject.ysomaankäytön suunnittelu
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16692
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5454
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5497
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p6755
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.datasethttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7919143
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121079
jyx.fundinginformationN.M., N.L., and A.M were supported by the Finnish Ministry of the Environment (Forest Biodiversity Programme in Southern Finland METSO YM8/221/2010, VN/6587/2018, VN/12123/2019-YM-2, and VN/28601/2020-YM-3). The work of P.H. was supported by VN/12123/2019-YM-2. A.M. was also supported by the Academy of Finland and the Strategic Research Council project IBC-Carbon, grant #312559.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY 4.0