Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBosco, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Valentin
dc.contributor.authorJones, Mirkka M.
dc.contributor.authorOpedal, Øystein
dc.contributor.authorOvaskainen, Otso
dc.contributor.authorSonja, Gerber
dc.contributor.authorVan Klink, Roel
dc.contributor.authorCushman, Samuel A.
dc.contributor.authorArlettaz, Raphaël
dc.contributor.authorJacot, Alain
dc.date.accessioned2023-01-19T11:26:44Z
dc.date.available2023-01-19T11:26:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBosco, L., Moser, V., Jones, M. M., Opedal, Ø., Ovaskainen, O., Sonja, G., Van Klink, R., Cushman, S. A., Arlettaz, R., & Jacot, A. (2023). Habitat area and local habitat conditions outweigh fragmentation effects on insect communities in vineyards. <i>Ecological Solutions and Evidence</i>, <i>4</i>(1), Article e12193. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12193" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.12193</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_172598717
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/85102
dc.description.abstractFragmentation of habitat, for example by intensive agricultural practices, can be detrimental to local biodiversity. However, it often remains unclear whether such biodiversity declines are caused by loss of habitat area or increased fragmentation, and how habitat quality factors into it. In our study system, vegetated vineyards are typically small, and isolated from one another, potentially limiting the distribution and dispersal of organisms. In a full-factorial experiment of a priori selected vegetated vineyard patches of differing size and fragmentation, we aimed to disentangle the effects of habitat area (area of vegetated vineyards), habitat fragmentation (number of vegetated vineyards per 100 ha) and field-scale ground vegetation density on ground beetle, leafhopper and wild bee communities using a combined framework of multiscale and multispecies modelling (Hierarchical Model of Species Communities). We demonstrate variable effects of habitat area, fragmentation and local ground vegetation density on the three insect groups: Increased habitat area at fine scales favours higher species richness of leafhoppers, while local vegetation density boosts species richness of both leafhoppers and ground beetles, whereas no community-level responses were detected for wild bees. We conclude that increased ground vegetation density at both field and landscape scales (i.e. higher habitat area) favours more diverse and abundant insect communities, while fragmentation effects are highly variable and species specific. In addition, our results highlight that mainly ground beetles and leafhoppers will benefit from simple ground greening measures in vineyards, while for wild bees environmental factors other than the ones tested here may drive community structure. We recommend increasing the number and area of vegetated vineyards (even at small spatial scales) requiring more nature-friendly farming practices especially regarding a reduction or renunciation from herbicide applications, while the within-field vegetation density should optimally be intermediate or high to favour a diverse insect community.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEcological Solutions and Evidence
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otheragriculture
dc.subject.otherground beetles
dc.subject.otherground vegetation
dc.subject.otherhierarchical model of species communities(HMSC)
dc.subject.otherjointspeciesdistributionmodels
dc.subject.otherleafhoppers
dc.subject.othervineyards
dc.subject.otherwildbees
dc.titleHabitat area and local habitat conditions outweigh fragmentation effects on insect communities in vineyards
dc.typeresearch article
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202301191403
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn2688-8319
dc.relation.numberinseries1
dc.relation.volume4
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2023 The Authors. Ecological Solutions and Evidence published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British Ecological Society.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.type.publicationarticle
dc.relation.grantnumber856506
dc.relation.grantnumber856506
dc.relation.projectidinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/856506/EU//LIFEPLAN
dc.subject.ysomaatalous
dc.subject.ysomehiläishoito
dc.subject.ysoviininviljely
dc.subject.ysomaakiitäjäiset
dc.subject.ysoyhdyskunnat
dc.subject.ysopintakasvillisuus
dc.subject.ysomehiläispesät
dc.subject.ysokaskaat
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4503
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17851
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11708
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19917
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5859
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23474
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p16319
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17796
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1002/2688-8319.12193
dc.relation.funderEuropean Commissionen
dc.relation.funderEuroopan komissiofi
jyx.fundingprogramERC European Research Council, H2020en
jyx.fundingprogramERC European Research Council, H2020fi
jyx.fundinginformationNorgesForskningsråd,Grant/AwardNumber:223257;AcademyofFinland,Grant/AwardNumber:309581;H2020EuropeanResearchCouncil,Grant/AwardNumber:856506;SchweizerischerNationalfondszurFörderungderWissenschaftlichenForschung,Grant/AwardNumber:31003A_149780;BurgergemeindeBern,Grant/AwardNumber:2017-506
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0