dc.contributor.author | Hartimo, Mirja | |
dc.contributor.editor | Aldea, Smaranda Andreea | |
dc.contributor.editor | Carr, David | |
dc.contributor.editor | Heinämaa, Sara | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-10-18T09:03:47Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-10-18T09:03:47Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Hartimo, M. (2022). Radical Besinnung as a Method for Phenomenological Critique. In S. A. Aldea, D. Carr, & S. Heinämaa (Eds.), <i>Phenomenology as Critique : Why Method Matters</i> (pp. 80-94). Routledge. Routledge Research in Phenomenology. <a href="https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191483-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003191483-6</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_156682832 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/83591 | |
dc.description.abstract | The chapter discusses Husserl’s method of historical reflection, radical Besinnung, as defined and used in Formale und transzendentale Logik (1929). Whereas Formal and Transcendental Logic introduces and displays Husserl’s usage of Besinnung in the context of the exact sciences, the chapter seeks to develop it as a more general critical method with which to approach any rational goal-directed activity. Husserl defines Besinnung as a method that enables understanding agents and their actions by explicating agents’ typically implicit goals. It leads to the inclusion of historical-teleological activities as part of Husserl’s natural understanding of the world. The transcendental reflection radicalizes Besinnung by clarifying the kinds of evidence sought for in activities and then suggesting revisions to the concepts and principles used. The result is inner critique, which means that the activities are criticized against the norms that arise from reflection on these activities themselves, and not from a comparison with external standards or measures. | en |
dc.format.extent | 292 | |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Routledge | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Phenomenology as Critique : Why Method Matters | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Routledge Research in Phenomenology | |
dc.rights | In Copyright | |
dc.subject.other | Husserl, Edmund | |
dc.title | Radical Besinnung as a Method for Phenomenological Critique | |
dc.type | bookPart | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202210184911 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/BookItem | |
dc.relation.isbn | 978-1-032-01511-8 | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 80-94 | |
dc.type.version | acceptedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © 2022 the contributors | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.subject.yso | tietoisuus | |
dc.subject.yso | toimijuus | |
dc.subject.yso | reflektio | |
dc.subject.yso | fenomenologia | |
dc.subject.yso | tieteenfilosofia | |
dc.subject.yso | metodologia | |
dc.subject.yso | transsendenssi | |
dc.format.content | fulltext | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7672 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2335 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23563 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2977 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3016 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7509 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12984 | |
dc.rights.url | http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.4324/9781003191483-6 | |
dc.type.okm | A3 | |