Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHeino, Jani
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Girón, Jorge
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, Heikki
dc.contributor.authorHellsten, Seppo
dc.contributor.authorIlmonen, Jari
dc.contributor.authorKarjalainen, Juha
dc.contributor.authorMäkinen, Teemu
dc.contributor.authorNyholm, Kristiina
dc.contributor.authorRopponen, Janne
dc.contributor.authorTakolander, Antti
dc.contributor.authorTolonen, Kimmo T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-18T12:05:48Z
dc.date.available2022-07-18T12:05:48Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationHeino, J., García Girón, J., Hämäläinen, H., Hellsten, S., Ilmonen, J., Karjalainen, J., Mäkinen, T., Nyholm, K., Ropponen, J., Takolander, A., & Tolonen, K. T. (2022). Assessing the conservation priority of freshwater lake sites based on taxonomic, functional and environmental uniqueness. <i>Diversity and Distributions</i>, <i>28</i>(9), 1966-1978. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.13598</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_148826099
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/82367
dc.description.abstractAim We propose a novel approach that considers taxonomic uniqueness, functional uniqueness and environmental uniqueness and show how it can be used in guiding conservation planning. We illustrate the approach using data for lake biota and environment. Location Lake Puruvesi, Finland. Methods We sampled macrophytes and macroinvertebrates from the same 18 littoral sites. By adapting the original “ecological uniqueness” approach, we used distance-based methods to calculate measures of taxonomic (LCBD–t), functional (LCBD–f) and environmental (LCEH) uniqueness for each site. We also considered the numbers and locations of the sites needed to protect up to 70% of total variation in taxonomic, functional or environmental features in the studied part of the lake. Results Relationships between taxonomic (LCBD–t), functional (LCBD–f) and environmental (LCEH) uniqueness were generally weak, and only the relationship between macrophyte LCBD–t and LCBD–f was statistically significant. Overall, however, if the whole biotic dataset was considered, macroinvertebrate LCBD–f values showed a consistent positive relationship with macrophyte LCBD–f. Depending on the measure of site uniqueness, between one-third to one half of the sites could help protect up to 70% of the ecological uniqueness of the studied part of Lake Puruvesi. Main conclusions Although the dataset examined originated from a large lake system, the approach we proposed here can be applied in different ecosystems and at various spatial scales. An important consideration is that a set of sites has been sampled using the same methods, resulting in species and environmental matrices that can be analysed using the methodological approach proposed here. This framework can be easily applied to grid-based data, sets of islands or sets of forest fragments. We suggest that the approach based on taxonomic, functional and environmental uniqueness will be a useful tool in guiding nature conservation and ecosystem management, especially if associated with meta-system ideas or network thinking.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiversity and Distributions
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherPuruvesi
dc.subject.otherSuomi
dc.subject.otherconservation assessment
dc.subject.otherecological uniqueness
dc.subject.otherenvironmental heterogeneity
dc.subject.othermacroinvertebrates
dc.subject.othermacrophytes
dc.titleAssessing the conservation priority of freshwater lake sites based on taxonomic, functional and environmental uniqueness
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202207183930
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineAkvaattiset tieteetfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineResurssiviisausyhteisöfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineAquatic Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineSchool of Resource Wisdomen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1966-1978
dc.relation.issn1366-9516
dc.relation.numberinseries9
dc.relation.volume28
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2022 the Authors
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumberLIFE14 IPE/FI/023
dc.subject.ysomakea vesi
dc.subject.ysoluonnonsuojelu
dc.subject.ysojärvet
dc.subject.ysoarviointi
dc.subject.ysovesiensuojelu
dc.subject.ysovesiekosysteemit
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysovesikasvit
dc.subject.ysoselkärangattomat
dc.subject.ysopriorisointi
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3793
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p9374
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7413
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3163
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p11000
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p21799
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3931
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p15620
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1111/ddi.13598
dc.relation.funderEuropean Commissionen
dc.relation.funderEuroopan komissiofi
jyx.fundingprogramLIFEen
jyx.fundingprogramLIFEfi
jyx.fundinginformationThe work for this study was supported by Freshabit IP LIFE (LIFE 14 IPE/FI/023) and the Academy of Finland for the project GloBioTrends (grant no. 331957).
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0