Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPremate, Ester
dc.contributor.authorBorko, Špela
dc.contributor.authorKralj‐Fišer, Simona
dc.contributor.authorJennions, Michael
dc.contributor.authorFišer, Žiga
dc.contributor.authorBalázs, Gergely
dc.contributor.authorBíró, Anna
dc.contributor.authorBračko, Gregor
dc.contributor.authorCopilaş‐Ciocianu, Denis
dc.contributor.authorHrga, Nuša
dc.contributor.authorHerczeg, Gábor
dc.contributor.authorRexhepi, Behare
dc.contributor.authorZagmajster, Maja
dc.contributor.authorZakšek, Valerija
dc.contributor.authorFromhage, Lutz
dc.contributor.authorFišer, Cene
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-25T08:26:46Z
dc.date.available2021-08-25T08:26:46Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationPremate, E., Borko, Š., Kralj‐Fišer, S., Jennions, M., Fišer, Ž., Balázs, G., Bíró, A., Bračko, G., Copilaş‐Ciocianu, D., Hrga, N., Herczeg, G., Rexhepi, B., Zagmajster, M., Zakšek, V., Fromhage, L., & Fišer, C. (2021). No room for males in caves : Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus. <i>Journal of Evolutionary Biology</i>, <i>34</i>(10), 1653-1661. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13917" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13917</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_100258468
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/77485
dc.description.abstractSex allocation theory predicts that the proportion of daughters to sons will evolve in response to ecological conditions that determine the costs and benefits of producing each sex. All else being equal, the adult sex ratio (ASR) should also vary with ecological conditions. Many studies of subterranean species reported female-biased ASR, but no systematic study has yet been conducted. We test the hypothesis that the ASR becomes more female-biased with increased isolation from the surface. We compiled a dataset of ASRs of 35 species in the subterranean amphipod Niphargus, each living in one of three distinct habitats (surface-subterranean boundary, cave streams, phreatic lakes) representing an environmental gradient of increased isolation underground. The ASR was female-biased in 27 of 35 species; the bias was statistically significant in 12 species. We found significant difference in the ASR among habitats after correction for phylogeny. It is most weakly female-biased at the surface-subterranean boundary and most strongly female-biased in phreatic lakes. Additional modelling suggests that the ASR has evolved towards a single value for both surface-subterranean boundary and cave stream dwelling species, and another value for 9 of 11 phreatic lake dwellers. We suggest that a history of inbreeding in subterranean populations might lower inbreeding depression such that kin selection favours mating with siblings. This could select for a female-biased offspring sex ratio due to local mate competition among brothers. The observed patterns in sex ratios in subterranean species make them a group worthy of more attention from those interested in sex allocation theory.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJournal of Evolutionary Biology
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.othersukupuolten allokaatioteoria
dc.subject.othersex allocation theory
dc.subject.otherAmphipoda
dc.subject.otherextreme habitats
dc.subject.othercaves
dc.titleNo room for males in caves : Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202108254649
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineEkologia ja evoluutiobiologiafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineEcology and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange1653-1661
dc.relation.issn1010-061X
dc.relation.numberinseries10
dc.relation.volume34
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2021 Wiley
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysosukupuoli
dc.subject.ysoluonnonvalinta
dc.subject.ysoseksuaalivalinta
dc.subject.ysoelinympäristö
dc.subject.ysokoiraat
dc.subject.ysonaaraat
dc.subject.ysopopulaatioekologia
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5291
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4473
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14268
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p14074
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p22049
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p22050
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20115
dc.rights.urlhttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.relation.datasethttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5175861
dc.relation.doi10.1111/jeb.13917
jyx.fundinginformationNew National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Innovation and Technology, Hubgary, Grant/Award Number: ÚNKP20-4; Republic of Slovenia, Ministry of Education, Science and Sport and the European Union from the European Regional Development Fund; Javna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RS, Grant/Award Number: J1-2464, N1-0069, P1-0184 and P1-0236; Research Council of Lithuania, Grant/Award Number: 09.3.3-LMT-K-712-19-0149; Hungarian National Research, Development and Innovation Fund, Grant/ Award Number: #SNN-125627
dc.type.okmA1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

In Copyright
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as In Copyright