Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTolonen, Kimmo T.
dc.contributor.authorKarjalainen, Juha
dc.contributor.authorHämäläinen, Heikki
dc.contributor.authorNyholm, Kristiina
dc.contributor.authorRahkola-Sorsa, Minna
dc.contributor.authorCai, Yongjiu
dc.contributor.authorHeino, Jani
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-14T06:01:37Z
dc.date.available2020-07-14T06:01:37Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationTolonen, K. T., Karjalainen, J., Hämäläinen, H., Nyholm, K., Rahkola-Sorsa, M., Cai, Y., & Heino, J. (2020). Do the ecological drivers of lake littoral communities match and lead to congruence between organism groups?. <i>Aquatic Ecology</i>, <i>54</i>(3), 839-854. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09781-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10452-020-09781-x</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_41570005
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/71149
dc.description.abstractLake littoral environments are heterogeneous, and different organisms typically show specific responses to this environmental variation. We examined local environmental and spatial factors affecting lake littoral biodiversity and the structuring of assemblages of phytoplankton, zooplankton and macroinvertebrates within and among three basins of a large lake system. We explored congruence of species composition and species richness among the studied organism groups to evaluate their general indicator potential to represent spatial variation in other groups. We expected that effects of water chemistry on plankton assemblages were stronger than effects of habitat characteristics. In contrast, we anticipated stronger effects of habitat on macroinvertebrates due to their mainly benthic mode of life. We also expected that within-basin spatial effects would be strongest on macroinvertebrates and weakest on phytoplankton. We predicted weak congruence in assemblage composition and species richness among the organism groups. Phytoplankton assemblages were mainly structured by the shared effects of water chemistry and large-scale spatial factors. In contrast to our expectations, habitat effects were stronger than water chemistry effects on zooplankton assemblages. However, as expected, macroinvertebrate species composition and richness were mainly affected by habitat conditions. Among-group congruence was weak for assemblage composition and insignificant for richness. Albeit weak, congruence was strongest between phytoplankton and zooplankton assemblages, as we expected. In summary, our analyses do not support the idea of using a single organism group as a wholesale biodiversity indicator.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.languageeng
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAquatic Ecology
dc.rightsCC BY 4.0
dc.subject.otherlake littoral zone
dc.subject.othercommunity structuring
dc.subject.otherspecies richness
dc.subject.otherenvironmental filtering
dc.subject.otherspatial processes
dc.subject.othercongruence
dc.titleDo the ecological drivers of lake littoral communities match and lead to congruence between organism groups?
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202007145312
dc.contributor.laitosBio- ja ympäristötieteiden laitosfi
dc.contributor.laitosDepartment of Biological and Environmental Scienceen
dc.contributor.oppiaineAkvaattiset tieteetfi
dc.contributor.oppiaineAquatic Sciencesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange839-854
dc.relation.issn1386-2588
dc.relation.numberinseries3
dc.relation.volume54
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© The Authors 2020
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.relation.grantnumberLIFE14 IPE/FI/023
dc.subject.ysorantavyöhykkeet
dc.subject.ysoluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.subject.ysohabitaatti
dc.subject.ysobiodiversiteetti
dc.subject.ysoeliöyhteisöt
dc.subject.ysoplankton
dc.subject.ysoselkärangattomat
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7489
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5497
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5678
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p5496
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p4636
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3053
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p3931
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1007/s10452-020-09781-x
dc.relation.funderEuroopan komissiofi
dc.relation.funderEuropean Commissionen
jyx.fundingprogramLIFE+fi
jyx.fundingprogramLIFE+en
jyx.fundinginformationOpen access funding provided by Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE). Authors acknowledge the technical staff of the University of Joensuu for their help in the field sampling. We also thank Maa-ja Vesitekniikan tuki ry (Grant No. 13-7883-20), Academy of Finland, Maj and Tor Nessling Foundation, the EU Project FRESHABIT LIFE IP (LIFE14 IPE/FI/023) and the Youth Innovation Promotion Association CAS (2020316) for financial support of this study.


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

CC BY 4.0
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as CC BY 4.0