dc.contributor.author | Van Aerschot, Lina | |
dc.contributor.author | Parviainen, Jaana | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-06-09T04:07:29Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-06-09T04:07:29Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Van Aerschot, L., & Parviainen, J. (2020). Robots responding to care needs? : A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance. <i>Ethics and Information Technology</i>, <i>22</i>(3), 247-256. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09536-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09536-0</a> | |
dc.identifier.other | CONVID_35889788 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/69785 | |
dc.description.abstract | Twenty-five years ago, robotics guru Joseph Engelberger had a mission to motivate research teams all over the world to design the ‘Elderly Care Giver’, a multitasking personal robot assistant for everyday care needs in old age. In this article, we discuss how this vision of omnipotent care robots has influenced the design strategies of care robotics, the development of R&D initiatives and ethics research on use of care robots. Despite the expectations of robots revolutionizing care of older people, the role of robots in human care has remained marginal. The value of world trade in service robots, including care robots, is rather small. We argue that the implementation of robots in care is not primarily due to negative user attitudes or ethical problems, but to problems in R&D and manufacturing. The care robots currently available on the market are capable of simple, repetitive tasks or colloquial interaction. Thus far, also research on care robots is mostly conducted using imagi-nary scenarios or small-scale tests built up for research purposes. To develop useful and affordable robot solutions that are ethically, socially and ecologically sustainable, we suggest that robot initiatives should be evaluated within the framework of care ecosystems. This implies that attention has to be paid to the social, emotional and practical contexts in which care is given and received. Also, the political, economic and ecological realities of organizing care and producing technological commodities have to be acknowledged. It is time to openly discuss the drivers behind care robot initiatives to outline the bigger picture of organizing care under conditions of limited resources. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language | eng | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Springer | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Ethics and Information Technology | |
dc.rights | CC BY 4.0 | |
dc.subject.other | care robots | |
dc.subject.other | care ethics | |
dc.subject.other | robot design | |
dc.subject.other | effective | |
dc.subject.other | affective | |
dc.subject.other | care ecosystem | |
dc.title | Robots responding to care needs? : A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance | |
dc.type | article | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:fi:jyu-202006094042 | |
dc.contributor.laitos | Yhteiskuntatieteiden ja filosofian laitos | fi |
dc.contributor.laitos | Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Ikääntymisen ja hoivan tutkimuksen huippuyksikkö | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Yhteiskuntapolitiikka | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö | fi |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Centre of Excellence in Research on Ageing and Care | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | Social and Public Policy | en |
dc.contributor.oppiaine | School of Wellbeing | en |
dc.type.uri | http://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle | |
dc.type.coar | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1 | |
dc.description.reviewstatus | peerReviewed | |
dc.format.pagerange | 247-256 | |
dc.relation.issn | 1388-1957 | |
dc.relation.numberinseries | 3 | |
dc.relation.volume | 22 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | |
dc.rights.copyright | © The Authors 2020 | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | fi |
dc.relation.grantnumber | 312303 | |
dc.subject.yso | hoivapalvelut | |
dc.subject.yso | robotit | |
dc.subject.yso | hoivatyö | |
dc.subject.yso | hyvinvointiteknologia | |
dc.subject.yso | eettisyys | |
dc.subject.yso | robotiikka | |
dc.format.content | fulltext | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7666 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2619 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7422 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p12902 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23085 | |
jyx.subject.uri | http://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p2615 | |
dc.rights.url | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.relation.doi | 10.1007/s10676-020-09536-0 | |
dc.relation.funder | Research Council of Finland | en |
dc.relation.funder | Suomen Akatemia | fi |
jyx.fundingprogram | Centre of Excellence, AoF | en |
jyx.fundingprogram | Huippuyksikkörahoitus, SA | fi |
jyx.fundinginformation | Open access funding provided by University of Jyväskylä (JYU). This study was funded by the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland (Grant Number 292980) and the Academy of Finland grant to the Centre of Excellence in Research on Ageing and Care (Grant Number 312303). | |
dc.type.okm | A1 | |