Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorPeura, Maiju
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-19T12:17:39Z
dc.date.available2020-03-19T12:17:39Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.isbn978-951-39-8114-3
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/68244
dc.description.abstractMore sustainable silvicultural approaches are needed to stop the loss of biodiversity and ecosystem services. Most boreal forests are managed with rotation forestry, and continuous cover forestry has been suggested to be a method to reduce the negative impacts of forestry on nature. In the thesis, I studied the impacts of continuous cover forestry on biodiversity and ecosystem services in boreal forests in Finland. I used long-term forest simulations in commercial forest landscapes and empirical methods in streamside key habitats. Simulations showed that continuous cover forestry could be a cost-efficient method to retain ecosystem services and, for example, habitats of species dependent on deciduous trees or mature forest structure. However, at the landscape scale, diverse use of regimes from both continuous cover forestry and rotation forestry was the best in terms of both biodiversity and ecosystem services. Moreover, the amount of dead wood was low in both silvicultural approaches. Empirical studies, on the other hand, showed that the selective loggings of continuous cover forestry disturbed the natural features in streamside key habitats and therefore are not a sustainable method to manage these habitats. The area of unmanaged forests needs to be increased to stop the biodiversity decline. Scenario simulations revealed that from both ecological and economic perspectives, it could be effective to allocate strict protection and conservation measures in commercial stands jointly into specific landscapes. Together, the studies of my thesis suggest that increasing the share of continuous cover forestry in commercial forest landscapes could alleviate the negative impacts of forestry on biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, more protection, careful landscape-scale planning, and retention of essential biodiversity features, such as dead wood or key habitats, are still needed irrespective of the silvicultural approach. Moreover, both rotation forestry and continuous cover forestry can be done more or less intensively. Therefore, instead of strongly contrasting the approaches, more attention should be paid into the amount of harvested timber in commercial forests. Keywords: Conservation; empirical research; simulation; spatial planning; uneven-aged forestry.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJyväskylän yliopisto
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJYU Dissertations
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli I:</b> Peura M., Burgas D., Eyvindson K., Repo A. & Mönkkönen M. 2018. Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in Fennoscandia. Biological Conservation 217: 104-112. </i><a href=" http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018"target="_blank"> DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018.</a>
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli II:</b> Oldén A., Peura M., Saine S., Kotiaho J. S. & Halme P. 2019. The effect of buffer strip width and selective logging on riparian forest microclimate. Forest Ecology and Management 453: 117623.. </i><a href=" http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117623"target="_blank"> DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117623.</a>
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli III:</b> Peura M., Oldén A., Elo M., Kotiaho J., Mönkkönen M. & Halme P. 2020. The effect of buffer strip width and selective logging on streamside polypore communities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. <i>Accepted manuscript. </i>
dc.relation.haspart<b>Artikkeli IV:</b> Peura M., Eyvindson K., Mönkkönen M., Burgas D., Raatikainen K. & Kotiaho J. 2020. Cost-effective biodiversity protection through multiuseconservation landscapes.<i>Manuscript. </i>
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subjectmetsänkäsittely
dc.subjectmetsäsuunnittelu
dc.subjectjatkuva kasvatus
dc.subjecttalousmetsät
dc.subjectmetsiensuojelu
dc.subjectsuojelualueet
dc.subjectsuojavyöhykkeet
dc.subjectluonnon monimuotoisuus
dc.subjectbiodiversiteetti
dc.subjectekosysteemipalvelut
dc.subjectkestävä metsätalous
dc.subjectconservation
dc.subjectempirical research
dc.subjectsimulation
dc.subjectspatial planning
dc.subjectuneven-aged forestry
dc.titleContinuous cover forestry, biodiversity and ecosystem services
dc.typeDiss.
dc.identifier.urnURN:ISBN:978-951-39-8114-3
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaFaculty of Mathematics and Scienceen
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaMatemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.relation.issn2489-9003
dc.rights.copyright© The Author & University of Jyväskylä
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.type.publicationdoctoralThesis
dc.format.contentfulltext
dc.rights.urlhttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

In Copyright
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on In Copyright