dc.contributor.author | Peura, Maiju | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-19T12:17:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-19T12:17:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-951-39-8114-3 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/68244 | |
dc.description.abstract | More sustainable silvicultural approaches are needed to stop the loss of
biodiversity and ecosystem services. Most boreal forests are managed with
rotation forestry, and continuous cover forestry has been suggested to be a
method to reduce the negative impacts of forestry on nature. In the thesis, I
studied the impacts of continuous cover forestry on biodiversity and ecosystem
services in boreal forests in Finland. I used long-term forest simulations in
commercial forest landscapes and empirical methods in streamside key habitats.
Simulations showed that continuous cover forestry could be a cost-efficient
method to retain ecosystem services and, for example, habitats of species
dependent on deciduous trees or mature forest structure. However, at the
landscape scale, diverse use of regimes from both continuous cover forestry and
rotation forestry was the best in terms of both biodiversity and ecosystem
services. Moreover, the amount of dead wood was low in both silvicultural
approaches. Empirical studies, on the other hand, showed that the selective
loggings of continuous cover forestry disturbed the natural features in
streamside key habitats and therefore are not a sustainable method to manage
these habitats. The area of unmanaged forests needs to be increased to stop the
biodiversity decline. Scenario simulations revealed that from both ecological and
economic perspectives, it could be effective to allocate strict protection and
conservation measures in commercial stands jointly into specific landscapes.
Together, the studies of my thesis suggest that increasing the share of continuous
cover forestry in commercial forest landscapes could alleviate the negative
impacts of forestry on biodiversity and ecosystem services. However, more
protection, careful landscape-scale planning, and retention of essential
biodiversity features, such as dead wood or key habitats, are still needed
irrespective of the silvicultural approach. Moreover, both rotation forestry and
continuous cover forestry can be done more or less intensively. Therefore, instead
of strongly contrasting the approaches, more attention should be paid into the
amount of harvested timber in commercial forests.
Keywords: Conservation; empirical research; simulation; spatial planning;
uneven-aged forestry. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Jyväskylän yliopisto | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | JYU Dissertations | |
dc.relation.haspart | <b>Artikkeli I:</b> Peura M., Burgas D., Eyvindson K., Repo A. & Mönkkönen M. 2018. Continuous cover forestry is a cost-efficient tool to increase multifunctionality of boreal production forests in Fennoscandia. Biological Conservation 217: 104-112. </i><a href=" http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018"target="_blank"> DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.018.</a> | |
dc.relation.haspart | <b>Artikkeli II:</b> Oldén A., Peura M., Saine S., Kotiaho J. S. & Halme P. 2019. The effect of buffer strip width and selective logging on riparian forest microclimate. Forest Ecology and Management 453: 117623.. </i><a href=" http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117623"target="_blank"> DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117623.</a> | |
dc.relation.haspart | <b>Artikkeli III:</b> Peura M., Oldén A., Elo M., Kotiaho J., Mönkkönen M. & Halme P. 2020. The effect of buffer strip width and selective logging on streamside polypore communities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. <i>Accepted manuscript. </i> | |
dc.relation.haspart | <b>Artikkeli IV:</b> Peura M., Eyvindson K., Mönkkönen M., Burgas D., Raatikainen K. & Kotiaho J. 2020. Cost-effective biodiversity protection through multiuseconservation landscapes.<i>Manuscript. </i> | |
dc.rights | In Copyright | |
dc.subject | metsänkäsittely | |
dc.subject | metsäsuunnittelu | |
dc.subject | jatkuva kasvatus | |
dc.subject | talousmetsät | |
dc.subject | metsiensuojelu | |
dc.subject | suojelualueet | |
dc.subject | suojavyöhykkeet | |
dc.subject | luonnon monimuotoisuus | |
dc.subject | biodiversiteetti | |
dc.subject | ekosysteemipalvelut | |
dc.subject | kestävä metsätalous | |
dc.subject | conservation | |
dc.subject | empirical research | |
dc.subject | simulation | |
dc.subject | spatial planning | |
dc.subject | uneven-aged forestry | |
dc.title | Continuous cover forestry, biodiversity and ecosystem services | |
dc.type | Diss. | |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:ISBN:978-951-39-8114-3 | |
dc.contributor.tiedekunta | Faculty of Mathematics and Science | en |
dc.contributor.tiedekunta | Matemaattis-luonnontieteellinen tiedekunta | fi |
dc.contributor.yliopisto | University of Jyväskylä | en |
dc.contributor.yliopisto | Jyväskylän yliopisto | fi |
dc.relation.issn | 2489-9003 | |
dc.rights.copyright | © The Author & University of Jyväskylä | |
dc.rights.accesslevel | openAccess | |
dc.type.publication | doctoralThesis | |
dc.format.content | fulltext | |
dc.rights.url | https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/ | |