Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorPonkilainen, Ville T.
dc.contributor.authorTukiainen, Erkki J.
dc.contributor.authorUimonen, Mikko M.
dc.contributor.authorHäkkinen, Arja
dc.contributor.authorRepo, Jussi P.
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-03T08:56:33Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T22:35:11Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationPonkilainen, V. T., Tukiainen, E. J., Uimonen, M. M., Häkkinen, A., & Repo, J. P. (2020). Assessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures. <i>Foot and Ankle Surgery</i>, <i>26</i>(2), 169-174. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.009</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_28917854
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_80641
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/67695
dc.description.abstractBackground The structural validity of the Lower extremity functional scale (LEFS), the Visual analogue scale foot and ankle (VAS-FA), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) has not been compared earlier in patients after foot and ankle surgery. Methods Altogether 165 previously operated patients completed the foot and ankle specific instruments, the 15D health-related quality of life (HRQoL) instrument, and general health (VAS). Results The LEFS, the VAS-FA and the WOMAC had slight differences in their measurement properties. The VAS-FA had the best targeting and coverage. All three foot and ankle measures accounted for mobility and usual activities when compared to the different aspects of generic HRQoL. Conclusions The LEFS, the VAS-FA and the WOMAC have relatively similar psychometric properties among foot and ankle patients, yet the VAS-FA provides the best targeting and coverage.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFoot and Ankle Surgery
dc.rightsCC BY-NC-ND 4.0
dc.subject.otherVAS-FA
dc.subject.otherLEFS
dc.subject.otherWOMAC
dc.subject.otherPROM
dc.subject.otheroutcome
dc.subject.othermeasures
dc.titleAssessment of the structural validity of three foot and ankle specific patient-reported outcome measures
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-202002031949
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.contributor.oppiaineFysioterapiafi
dc.contributor.oppiainePhysiotherapyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2020-02-03T04:15:36Z
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange169-174
dc.relation.issn1268-7731
dc.relation.numberinseries2
dc.relation.volume26
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2019 European Foot and Ankle Society
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysovaliditeetti
dc.subject.ysoleikkaushoito
dc.subject.ysovalidointi
dc.subject.ysohoitotulokset
dc.subject.ysojalkaterät
dc.subject.ysonilkat
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p19898
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p842
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20652
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p25941
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23493
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p24005
dc.rights.urlhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.relation.doi10.1016/j.fas.2019.01.009
jyx.fundinginformationThis research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
dc.type.okmA1


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on CC BY-NC-ND 4.0