Embracing diverse worldviews to share planet Earth
Kohler, F., Holland, T. G., Kotiaho, J. S., Desrousseaux, M., & Potts, M. D. (2019). Embracing diverse worldviews to share planet Earth. Conservation Biology, 33(5), 1014-1022. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13304
Julkaistu sarjassa
Conservation BiologyTekijät
Päivämäärä
2019Tekijänoikeudet
© 2019 Society for Conservation Biology
Leading societies toward a more sustainable, equitably shared, and environmentally just future requires elevating and strengthening conversations on the nonmaterial and perhaps unquantifiable values of nonhuman nature to humanity. Debates among conservationists relating to the appropriateness of valuing ecosystems in terms of their human utility have eclipsed the more important and impactful task of expressing conservation concerns in terms that are meaningful to diverse stakeholders. We considered the wide global diversity of perspectives on the biosocial complex—the relationships and interactions between all living species on Earth—and argue that humanity's best chance for effective conservation is to take a pluralistic approach that engages seriously with the worldviews of all stakeholders. Many worldviews—particularly those in indigenous cultures—place a higher value on the spiritual and nonmaterial aspects than what is often represented by the discourse surrounding Western conservation policy. Alternative framings of the biosocial complex that recognize nature's intrinsic value can be powerful motivators for social change and for local‐scale conservation efforts. At a national and international level, changing ethical framings of human relationships with nature have started influencing conceptions of human rights relating to the environment and of the rights of nature itself. This change has led to an increased role of the judiciary in promoting environmental sustainability and promoting justice for groups who are most often affected by environmental harms. We hope our essay will motivate the scientific community to change its own perception of what a sound and sustainable relationship between humanity and other species should be and will help citizens become active environmental subjects, connected to the ecosystems around them.
...
Julkaisija
Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.ISSN Hae Julkaisufoorumista
0888-8892Asiasanat
Julkaisu tutkimustietojärjestelmässä
https://converis.jyu.fi/converis/portal/detail/Publication/28949892
Metadata
Näytä kaikki kuvailutiedotKokoelmat
Lisenssi
Samankaltainen aineisto
Näytetään aineistoja, joilla on samankaltainen nimeke tai asiasanat.
-
Naturalizing culture : time for an ecological understanding of “culture” in international culture and sustainability policies
Pyykkönen, Miikka (Frontiers Media SA, 2024)The current hegemonic understanding of culture and sustainability leans strongly on the conceptualization of ‘culture’ as profoundly anthropocentric. ‘Sustainability’ in cultural policies again means often the potential ... -
Whose Well-Being? : Deep-Ecological and Posthuman Perspectives on ‘World Worth Living In’
Huttunen, Rauno; Heikkinen, Hannu L. T. (Springer, 2024)The purpose of this chapter is to examine the question of who is meant in this book when defining its mission to pursue ‘living well in a world worth living in for all.’ Who, or which, are ‘all’ in this phrase? The authors ... -
Does the ecosystem service discourse succeed in promoting nature conservation?
González López, Sonia (2018)Ekosysteemipalvelut on otettu käsitteenä kiinteäksi osaksi poliittista ja tieteellistä keskustelua. Ekosysteemipalveluilla tarkoitetaan niitä hyötyjä, joita ihminen saa luonnosta ja ekosysteemeistä, ja käsite on kasvattanut ... -
Anthropocentrism versus Ecocentrism Revisited: Theoretical Confusions and Practical Conclusions
Kortetmäki, Teea (De Gruyter, 2013)One of the hardest questions in environmental philosophy is the debate between anthropocentric and ecocentric accounts of value. I argue that a great deal of the disagreement in this debate arises from a) misunderstanding ... -
China's economic, environmental and social development in crossfire : province-specific analysis of China's ecological modernization and sustainability
Häyhä, Laura (2014)Häyhä, Laura. China’s Economic, Environmental and Social Development in Crossfire – Province-specific Analysis of China’s Ecological Modernization and Sustainability. Master thesis. Autumn 2014. Supervisor: Pertti ...
Ellei toisin mainittu, julkisesti saatavilla olevia JYX-metatietoja (poislukien tiivistelmät) saa vapaasti uudelleenkäyttää CC0-lisenssillä.