Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorDatye, Sameer
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-15T12:21:26Z
dc.date.available2019-04-15T12:21:26Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.isbn978-951-39-5019-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/63501
dc.description.abstractThe Social and Voluntary work sector operates outside the organised boundaries and systems of normal business, financial and government organisational institutions. My target during this research has been to develop an optimum solution for decision support towards committing and accepting resources in the Social Work and Voluntary sector. In initial part of this monograph, I have traced the history of Design Thinking from the time it was ‘art and craft’ until modern times where multiple approaches are tried, tested and implemented for solution development. For the actual application development, I have chosen the Life-based Design conceptual framework. Three design iterations were made in the application development process- Early Design Phase, iReach 1.0 and iReach 2.0. Usability tests measuring performance and focus groups giving insights about the perception of the solution were conducted with each iteration. The key-insight during the design development journey was that the users do not want a solution to make a decision for them. They expect to be presented with easily visible. searchable, sortable and filterable tool that provide emotional cues about the choices available. Multiple stakeholders influenced the decision making process and no single individual makes the decisions. This led me to choose SilverLight PivotControl tool for presenting data instead of using standard components. Post the application development stage, I have recommended a new software development lifecycle model (SDLC) based on the actual development experience of Life-based design conceptual framework implementation. I believe that traditional SDLC models either lack ability of combining the long- term planning approach or flexibility, with each of them focusing on either end of the spectrum. On the other hand, the traditional models have a strong engineering approach while lacking a human-solution-oriented approach. The model that I propose leverages the benefits of traditional approach of waterfall, prototyping and agile models and uses them at different stages of the development process to optimise the output and do so in a cost effective way, deriving full benefits of the Life-Based design approach using practical usability engineering tools.fi
dc.language.isoeng
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJyväskylä studies in computing
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.othertechnical solution for social sectorfi
dc.subject.otherlife-based design practical implementationfi
dc.subject.otherapplication development modelfi
dc.subject.otherhuman-centred designfi
dc.titleLife-based design for technical solutions in social and voluntary work
dc.typedoctoral thesis
dc.identifier.urnURN:ISBN:978-951-39-5019-4
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.tiedekuntaInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.yliopistoUniversity of Jyväskyläen
dc.contributor.yliopistoJyväskylän yliopistofi
dc.type.coarhttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_db06
dc.relation.numberinseries164
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccess
dc.type.publicationdoctoralThesis
dc.subject.ysososiaalityöfi
dc.subject.ysovapaaehtoistyöfi
dc.subject.ysopäätöksentekofi
dc.subject.ysoalustatfi
dc.subject.ysomallitfi
dc.subject.ysosuunnittelufi
dc.subject.ysoihminen-konejärjestelmätfi
dc.subject.ysososiaalialafi
dc.subject.ysoteknologiafi
dc.subject.ysoatk-ohjelmatfi
dc.subject.ysoohjelmistokehitysfi
dc.subject.ysokäytettävyysfi
dc.subject.ysokäyttäjälähtöisyysfi
dc.subject.ysohyvinvointiteknologiafi
dc.rights.urlhttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

In Copyright
Ellei muuten mainita, aineiston lisenssi on In Copyright