How to detect elusive species? Detection dogs in nature conservation
Grimm-Seyfarth, A. and Klenke, R. (2018). How to detect elusive species? Detection dogs in nature conservation. 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. doi: 10.17011/conference/eccb2018/108096
Date
2018Copyright
© the Authors, 2018
Nature conservation often faces the problem that many species are difficult to monitor. This is especially true for species that elusive, nocturnal, or hard to capture. In addition, some of those threatened species are conflict-laden at the same time [1]. Without proper monitoring data, it is challenging or even impossible to make evidence-based statements regarding these species' distributions, population status and trends which is inevitable for their conservation and management. Importantly, this does not only include small-bodied pest species but also medium-sized or large vertebrate species. For example, the Eurasian wolf (Canis lupus), the Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx), or the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra) are locally listed as (critically) endangered, listed in the annex IV of the European Habitats Directive, and can locally cause severe conflicts with humans. Improving monitoring methods is thus highly important.
Monitoring of a species can be done through visual or acoustic observations or through evidences that the species was present in the recent past, such as tracks, scats, or hair. Evidence-based monitoring has the advantage that it is non-invasive and thus harmless. It can be done by humans but also with support of special detection dogs, such as scat, den, or roost detection dogs. While in former times dogs have been used for hunting, since the last century, they are increasingly used to detect rare or elusive species and their evidences. The use of wildlife detection dogs is particularly well established in America, New Zealand, Australia, and Africa, but also European monitoring projects increasingly deploy detection dogs. We tested the advantages of scat detection dogs in the Eurasian otter and found that detection dogs were more likely to find the scat of the correct species than humans visually searching for scat. Moreover, detection dog teams were twice as fast and collected three times more scats. In a review of almost 600 publications, we then looked for general advantages and disadvantages of wildlife detections dogs. We found that in most studies detection dogs increased efficiency making it a cost-effective method. Some authors claimed that the species would not have been found without detection dogs. Also, their well-developed olfactory sense allowed dogs to differentiate much clearer between signs of related species reducing false detections. Occasionally, a combination with other methods, such as cameras, hair sticks, or live-trapping, was suggested. Only in <1% of all studies, detection dogs performed worse than other monitoring methods, mainly due to inappropriate training or too dense vegetation where dogs could either not enter or not search freely. We conclude that given proper training, wildlife detection dogs can significantly increase both data quantity and quality in species monitoring.
[1] Klenke et al. 2013. Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Europe. Springer.
One detection dogs alterting at otter scat.
...
Publisher
Open Science Centre, University of JyväskyläConference
ECCB2018: 5th European Congress of Conservation Biology. 12th - 15th of June 2018, Jyväskylä, Finland
Original source
https://peerageofscience.org/conference/eccb2018/108096/Metadata
Show full item recordCollections
- ECCB 2018 [712]
License
Related items
Showing items with similar title or keywords.
-
Dead wood and fungi : detection, diversity and conservation in boreal forests
Purhonen, Jenna (Jyväskylän yliopisto, 2018)Dead wood and associated fungal communities are a crucial part of boreal forest ecosystems, and severely affected and threatened by human actions like commercial timber harvesting. Despite their importance for forest ... -
Conservation needs to integrate fire management into an adaptive planning perspective to leverage wildfire suppression co-benefits for bird conservation
Regos, Adrián; Hermoso, Virgilio; D'Amen, Manuela; Guisan, Antoine; Brotons, Lluís (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)Protected areas (PAs) play a key role in safeguarding biodiversity worldwide. However, their future role can be seriously compromised in dynamic socio-ecological systems due to their limited ability to incorporate the ... -
Integrative nature conservation strategies for wood production and biodiversity conservation
Müller, Jörg (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)The importance of beta-diversity in European forest requires concepts considering a wide range of set-aside elements ranging from single trees or logs to large strictly protected areas. A successful combination of such ... -
Data for conservation: GBIF supporting conservation science and its application
Rodrigues, Andrew (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)The need for evidence-based conservation remains of vital importance in achieving targets as set out by the Convention of Biological Diversity. The Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) is an open-data research ... -
Frontiers for conservation: targeting European borders as conservation areas
Ascensão, Fernando; D'Amico, Marcello; Barrientos, Rafael; Revilla, Eloy; Pereira, Henrique Miguel (Open Science Centre, University of Jyväskylä, 2018)It has been long recognized that political borders should not hamper wildlife, and that conservation actions involving several countries are known to bring large scale benefits to nature while helping to resolve social and ...