Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRantalainen, Timo
dc.contributor.authorHesketh, K. D.
dc.contributor.authorRodda, C.
dc.contributor.authorDuckham, R. L.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-24T11:51:26Z
dc.date.available2019-06-16T21:35:54Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationRantalainen, T., Hesketh, K. D., Rodda, C., & Duckham, R. L. (2018). Validity of Hip-worn Inertial Measurement Unit Compared to Jump Mat for Jump Height Measurement in Adolescents. <i>Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports</i>, <i>28</i>(10), 2183-2188. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13243" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.13243</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_28121418
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_78016
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/59648
dc.description.abstractJump tests assess lower body power production capacity, and can be used to evaluate athletic ability and development during growth. Wearable inertial measurement units (IMU) seem to offer a feasible alternative to laboratory‐based equipment for jump height assessments. Concurrent validity of these devices for jump height assessments has only been established in adults. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the concurrent validity of IMU‐based jump height estimate compared to contact mat‐based jump height estimate in adolescents. Ninety‐five adolescents (10‐13 years‐of‐age; girls N = 41, height = 154 (SD 9) cm, weight = 44 (11) kg; boys N = 54, height = 156 (10) cm, weight = 46 (13) kg) completed 3 counter‐movement jumps for maximal jump height on a contact mat. Inertial recordings (accelerations, rotations) were concurrently recorded with a hip‐worn IMU (sampling at 256 Hz). Jump height was evaluated based on flight time. The mean IMU‐derived jump height was 27.1 (SD 3.8) cm, and the corresponding mean jump‐mat‐derived value was 21.5 (3.4) cm. While a significant 26% mean difference was observed between the methods (5.5 [95% limits of agreement 2.2 to 8.9] cm, P = 0.006), the correspondence between methods was excellent (ICC = 0.89). The difference between methods was weakly positively associated with jump height (r = 0.28, P = 0.007). Take‐off velocity‐derived jump height was also explored but produced only fair congruence. In conclusion, IMU‐derived jump height exhibited excellent congruence to contact mat‐based jump height and therefore presents a feasible alternative for jump height assessments in adolescents.fi
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports
dc.rightsIn Copyright
dc.subject.otherwearable
dc.subject.otheraccelerometer
dc.subject.otherconcurrent
dc.titleValidity of Hip-worn Inertial Measurement Unit Compared to Jump Mat for Jump Height Measurement in Adolescents
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201809134122
dc.contributor.laitosLiikuntatieteellinen tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Sport and Health Sciencesen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2018-09-13T12:15:21Z
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.format.pagerange2183-2188
dc.relation.issn0905-7188
dc.relation.numberinseries10
dc.relation.volume28
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2018 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysokuntotestit
dc.subject.ysohyppääminen
dc.subject.ysomittausmenetelmät
dc.subject.ysometodologia
dc.format.contentfulltext
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17246
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p27825
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p20083
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p7509
dc.rights.urlhttp://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en
dc.relation.doi10.1111/sms.13243


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

In Copyright
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as In Copyright