University of Jyväskylä | JYX Digital Repository

  • English  | Give feedback |
    • suomi
    • English
 
  • Login
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
View Item 
  • JYX
  • Artikkelit
  • Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta
  • View Item
JYX > Artikkelit > Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta > View Item

Being Itself and the Being of Beings : Reading Aristotle’s Critique of Parmenides (Physics 1.3) after Metaphysics

ThumbnailFinal Draft
View/Open
386.7Kb

Downloads:  
Show download detailsHide download details  
Backman, J. (2018). Being Itself and the Being of Beings : Reading Aristotle’s Critique of Parmenides (Physics 1.3) after Metaphysics. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy, 22 (2), 271-291. doi:10.5840/epoche20171220103
Published in
Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy
Authors
Backman, Jussi
Date
2018
Discipline
Filosofia
Copyright
© Epoché, 2018. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Villanova University. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.

 
The essay studies Aristotle’s critique of Parmenides (Physics 1.3) in the light of the Heideggerian account of Platonic-Aristotelian metaphysics as an approach to being (Sein) in terms of beings (das Seiende). Aristotle’s critique focuses on the presuppositions of the Parmenidean thesis of the unity of being. It is argued that a close study of the presuppositions of Aristotle’s own critique reveals an important difference between the Aristotelian metaphysical framework and the Parmenidean “protometaphysical” approach. The Parmenides fragments indicate being as such in the sense of the pure, undifferentiated “is there” (τὸ ἐόν)—as the intelligible accessibility of meaningful reality to thinking, prior to its articulation into determinate beings. For Aristotle, by contrast, “being itself” (αὐτὸ τὸ ὄν) has no other plausible meaning than “being-something-determinate as such” (τὸ ὅπερ ὄν τι), which itself remains equivocal. In this sense, Aristotle can indeed be said to conceive being in terms of beings, as the being-ness of determinate beings. ...
Publisher
Villanova University
ISSN Search the Publication Forum
1085-1968
Keywords
Aristoteles metafysiikka oleminen Aristotle Parmenides metaphysics beings
DOI
10.5840/epoche20171220103
URI

http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201801151202

Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Humanistis-yhteiskuntatieteellinen tiedekunta [3547]
  • Browse materials
  • Browse materials
  • Articles
  • Conferences and seminars
  • Electronic books
  • Historical maps
  • Journals
  • Tunes and musical notes
  • Photographs
  • Presentations and posters
  • Publication series
  • Research reports
  • Research data
  • Study materials
  • Theses

Browse

All of JYXCollection listBy Issue DateAuthorsSubjectsPublished inDepartmentDiscipline

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics
  • How to publish in JYX?
  • Self-archiving
  • Publish Your Thesis Online
  • Publishing Your Dissertation
  • Publication services

Open Science at the JYU
 
Data Protection Description

Accessibility Statement
Open Science Centre