Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot

dc.contributor.authorDzhafarov, Ehtibar N.
dc.contributor.authorKujala, Janne
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-29T11:25:43Z
dc.date.available2017-09-07T21:45:05Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationDzhafarov, E. N., & Kujala, J. (2017). Probabilistic foundations of contextuality. <i>Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics</i>, <i>65</i>(6-8), Article 1600040. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.201600040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/prop.201600040</a>
dc.identifier.otherCONVID_26201107
dc.identifier.otherTUTKAID_71103
dc.identifier.urihttps://jyx.jyu.fi/handle/123456789/54723
dc.description.abstractContextuality is usually defined as absence of a joint distribution for a set of measurements (random variables) with known joint distributions of some of its subsets. However, if these subsets of measurements are not disjoint, contextuality is mathematically impossible even if one generally allows (as one must) for random variables not to be jointly distributed. To avoid contradictions one has to adopt the Contextuality-by-Default approach: measurements made in different contexts are always distinct and stochastically unrelated to each other. Contextuality is reformulated then in terms of the (im)possibility of imposing on all the measurements in a system a joint distribution of a particular kind: such that any measurements of one and the same property made in different contexts satisfy a specified property, C. In the traditional analysis of contextuality C means “are equal to each other with probability 1”. However, if the system of measurements violates the “nodisturbance principle”, due to signaling or experimental biases, then the meaning of C has to be generalized, and the proposed generalization is “are equal to each other with maximal possible probability” (applied to any set of measurements of one and the same property). This approach is illustrated on arbitrary systems of binary measurements, including most of quantum systems of traditional interest in contextuality studies (irrespective of whether the “no-disturbance” principle holds in them).
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherWiley - VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA
dc.relation.ispartofseriesFortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics
dc.subject.othercyclic system
dc.subject.other(in)consistent connectedness
dc.subject.othermultimaximal coupling
dc.titleProbabilistic foundations of contextuality
dc.typearticle
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:jyu-201706273070
dc.contributor.laitosInformaatioteknologian tiedekuntafi
dc.contributor.laitosFaculty of Information Technologyen
dc.contributor.oppiaineTietotekniikkafi
dc.contributor.oppiaineMathematical Information Technologyen
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticle
dc.date.updated2017-06-27T12:15:15Z
dc.type.coarjournal article
dc.description.reviewstatuspeerReviewed
dc.relation.issn0015-8208
dc.relation.numberinseries6-8
dc.relation.volume65
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion
dc.rights.copyright© 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. This is a final draft version of an article whose final and definitive form has been published by Wiley. Published in this repository with the kind permission of the publisher.
dc.rights.accesslevelopenAccessfi
dc.subject.ysokontekstuaalisuus
dc.subject.ysokytkentä
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p23891
jyx.subject.urihttp://www.yso.fi/onto/yso/p17795
dc.relation.doi10.1002/prop.201600040


Aineistoon kuuluvat tiedostot

Thumbnail

Aineisto kuuluu seuraaviin kokoelmiin

Näytä suppeat kuvailutiedot